Real ID, the Patriot Act, and the Funeral of Your Privacy

Oh, don’t act surprised. We were warned—loudly, clearly, and repeatedly. Orwell handed us the script back in 1949 with 1984, a chilling tale about a dystopian future ruled by tyrants armed with technology. The only thing he got wrong? The date. He was off by a few decades. Welcome to the show.

Then came Ted Kaczynski—yes, the Unabomber—whose 1995 manifesto Industrial Society and Its Future actually predicted with disturbing precision where this tech-obsessed world was headed. Sure, he mailed bombs (horrific, wrong, and indefensible), but buried in that 35,000-word screed were truths that our Silicon Valley overlords would prefer you ignore.

Fast forward to 2013. Edward Snowden peeled back the curtain and confirmed what Orwell and Kaczynski both hinted at: the government is watching you. All of you. All the time. The NSA was hoarding your phone records, digging through your emails, cozying up with big tech under the warm blanket of “national security.” The public screamed, Congress clutched its pearls, and then—poof—nothing changed. The programs didn’t end. They evolved, quietly, like a virus with a better PR team.

Enter Real ID—because apparently, the government didn’t know enough about you already. Now, if you want to fly or walk into a federal building, you’ll need your government-approved tracking badge with a shiny star. Why? Because the state needs your “valid” home address. They don’t want to just know who you are—they want to know exactly where you sleep at night.

Remember when driver’s licenses had no photos? When Social Security cards said “Not to be used for identification”? Those were quaint little relics of freedom—back when Americans were citizens, not livestock with barcodes.

And don’t get cute with burner phones. The feds can trace those right back to the 7-Eleven where you bought them. They’ll pull security footage, tag your face, grab your license plate, and follow you home like it’s a hobby.

This isn’t about safety. It’s about control. And guess what? It’s only getting worse. Technology isn’t liberating us—it’s forging our chains. And Americans? Oh, they’re too busy scrolling and swiping to notice the prison being built around them—one app, one camera, one “convenience” at a time.

As for me? Keep your Real ID. I already have a passport, and that’s all the ID I’ll ever need. I won’t pay for my own surveillance.

Let the sheep line up. I’m walking the other way.

The Most Troubling Aspect of the Menendez Brothers Crimes

Let’s cut to the chase. Lyle and Erik Menendez didn’t just kill their parents — they executed them in cold blood, with 12-gauge shotguns, inside the luxurious walls of their Beverly Hills mansion. It was a brutal ambush, and it wasn’t long before things started to unravel.

At first, police suspected a mob hit. The scene was that violent. But within seven months, the real story began to emerge — not through clever detective work, but from the brothers themselves, who couldn’t keep their stories straight and spent money like lottery winners on a deadline.

After the August 1989 murders, Lyle and Erik went on a jaw-dropping spending spree. Lyle picked up a Rolex, a Porsche, designer clothes, and even sank money into a restaurant in Princeton, New Jersey. He also paid for Erik’s private tennis coaching. Meanwhile, Erik bought a Jeep, entered tennis tournaments, and indulged in luxury travel and shopping like there was no tomorrow.

Together, they burned through hundreds of thousands of dollars in just six months. They even redecorated the mansion — replacing carpet and reupholstering furniture — before quickly moving out.

Prosecutors called it what it looked like: greed. The defense tried spinning it as a trauma-fueled reaction to years of alleged abuse. But trauma doesn’t come with receipts from Porsche dealerships and five-star hotels. The brothers’ blatant indulgence only reinforced what the public and prosecutors already suspected — that they killed for money. 

Was the “abuse excuse” something they cooked up with their first lawyer Leslie  Abramson?  

It took two trials, but justice caught up. Lyle and Erik were convicted and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The most disturbing part? It wasn’t just the murders — it was the aftermath. The calculated, shameless celebration of their new inheritance-funded freedom, paid for in blood.

I certainly can’t comment on their reportedly excellent prison records.  This sentence was not about reform but rather punishment..  It looks like the punishment is about to end through a resentencing or governor’s commutation.  

Arrested? Smile Like Your Future Depends on It—Because It Probably Does!

So, you’ve just been arrested. Great. Welcome to what is likely not going to be the best day of your life. But hey, this is exactly why you need to flash those pearly whites like you’re posing for a toothpaste commercial—because your booking photo is about to go public, baby!

We’ve all seen those glorious mugshots on TV—faces contorted in despair, rage, or just plain confusion. Some look like they’ve just seen a ghost, others are doing their best “Don Corleone” impression. It’s like a sad talent show for the emotionally wrecked.

Back in the day, booking photos came with that charming slate of police info—height, date, maybe a fun alias. But no more! The cops got tired of being sued because those CSI-style headshots made people look guilty, even when they were just misunderstood lovers of chaos.

Now? Booking photos look like they were snapped between chemistry and gym class. No police info, no context—just you and your “Why me?” face. And trust me, nothing screams “I probably did it” more than a pouty mug or a smirk that says, “Catch me if you can.”

And let’s not forget—if your arrest makes the news (bless your dramatic soul), your mugshot is going viral faster than your aunt’s meatloaf recipe. So do yourself a favor: look cheerful, look innocent, look like you’re on your way to brunch, not jail.

Bottom line: No matter what chaos led to this moment, smile like your lawyer’s retainer depends on it. Because it just might

Bizarre shooting and arrest of Jillian Shriner Weezer, Bassist Scott Shriner’s wife.

As long time criminal defense investigator, I can’t help but notice a foul odor connected to the arrest by Lapd officers of rock star Scott Shriner’s wife Jillian.  Jillian Shriner, better known by her pen name Jillian Lauren, is a bestselling author.

Not only was she arrested, but she suffered a gunshot wound inflicted by a cop.  

This thing unfolded as cops were chasing a trio of black males in the LA suburb of Eagle Rock California.  They ran from a freeway into the neighborhood.  With all the sirens and commotion , apparently Jillian Shriner came out to her driveway gun in hand.  Allegedly she fired her gun at the wanted suspects.  Were they a threat to her? The only person that knows for sure is none other than Jillian Shriner.  At some point cops claim she ignored multiple orders to drop her weapon. Cops claimed that she then fired her gun at them.  Somehow this doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.  The only thing that does make sense is because she was shot by a cop. They are going to have to justify their own gunplay.  I’m not accusing the cops here because I simply don’t know what happened.

A very little of this story makes any sense whatsoever.  If I was on the defense team, I would be all over the case like a cheap suit.  Because of the seriousness of the charges, Jillian Shriner can spend decades behind bars.  Her bail was astronomically set high at $1 million but she was able to post it and get released.  Oh, and she had to get medical care for her shoulder gunshot wound.

Right now, she is set for a court appearance on April 30 in department 30 in downtown LA.  It will be interesting to see what Lawyer will be handling her defense.  It’s going to take a while before the police body am footage and police reports begin to publicly surface.  Somehow, I suspect that the body cam footage that may or may not show justification for the police shooting will be unusually slow.

As a criminal defense investigator, this is exactly the kind of cases I specialize in handling.  

Charged with a Crime? The Battle for Your Freedom Has Begun

You’ve just been charged with a crime. From this moment forward, your life is no longer in your hands—it’s in the hands of total strangers. A prosecutor wants to brand you a criminal. A judge will control the battlefield. And if it goes that far, twelve jurors—who don’t know you and never will—will decide your fate.

Guilt or innocence? Right now, it barely matters. You’re in a system where perception can outweigh truth, and where justice depends on strategy, preparation, and how well you play the game.

The most important move you’ll make? Choosing the right lawyer.

Forget flashy media personalities with slick ads and big egos. They’re often chasing headlines, not justice. You want a fighter in your corner—quiet, focused, relentless. Look for someone who lives and breathes criminal law. Someone whose reputation is built in the courtroom, not on social media.

If your lawyer isn’t using a skilled investigator, you’re already at a disadvantage. No matter how good your attorney is, they can’t dig for the truth themselves. If they stumble onto evidence, they become a witness—and you’re left without a defender. A professional investigator can uncover the facts, find witnesses, and expose the cracks in the case against you. Yes, it’s an extra cost—but your future is worth every dime.

Next comes the most underestimated weapon you have: respect.

From this point forward, every move you make is being watched. The judge, the prosecutor, even the bailiff will size you up. You’re not just on trial—you’re on display. Think of it like courting a new relationship: appearance, manners, and attitude matter.

Show up sharp. Groomed, clean-cut, dressed like you’re stepping into a boardroom—not a bar. Business attire, polished shoes, no excuses. There’s nothing casual about a courtroom where your freedom is on the line.

Inside that courtroom, discipline is survival. No eye rolls, no groans, no slouching when a ruling goes against you. Be respectful to everyone—the judge, the bailiff, the clerk, and especially your lawyer. They’re all watching, and it all matters.

If your attorney puts you on the stand—an uncommon and risky move—you’d better be prepared for war. Cross-examination is a pressure cooker. The prosecutor will poke, prod, and provoke you. Don’t take the bait. Stay calm. Stay collected. Your lawyer should drill you beforehand like a Marine boot camp instructor, so you don’t flinch when the heat is on.

When you take the stand, own it. Rise with confidence. Smile. Walk briskly to the witness box like you belong there—because for a few minutes, that courtroom is yours. Speak clearly. Look those jurors in the eye. This is your one chance to be heard. Make it count.

And here’s something most people never understand until it’s too late: Nothing speaks louder to a judge or jury than the presence of respectful, supportive family and friends sitting behind you.

It’s human nature—when people see you’re not alone, not abandoned, and not the menace the state claims you are, it shifts perception. You suddenly look more human, more grounded, and more worthy of mercy or benefit of the doubt. Defendants who show up with visible support almost always fare better—either by winning acquittals or receiving more lenient sentences.

But there’s a catch: they must behave impeccably. No outbursts, no sighs, no dirty looks. Their role is silent strength—well-dressed, calm, respectful presence. That visual can be more powerful than any testimony.

The courtroom is a stage. Your life is the script. Play it right—or risk everything.

Chicago Cops Slammed with Sudden Ban on the Sig/Sauer P320—And the Officers Will Pay thePrice

In a move that’s rocking the rank and file, the Chicago Police Department has abruptly banned the use of the once-trusted Sig/Sauer P320 pistol as an authorized duty weapon. The order came down swiftly, leaving thousands of officers scrambling. The official reason? Alarming reports that the weapon can fire without the trigger being pulled.

For years now the gun-maker has brushed off horror stories about negligent discharges, usually blaming human error. After all, it’s easier to blame the gun than admit to a deadly mistake. Just think back to Alec Baldwin’s tragic shooting on a New Mexico movie set—he insisted he never pulled the trigger, yet a woman lost her life. But experts were quick to point out that the revolver in question simply doesn’t fire on its own.

This, however, isn’t Hollywood.

The Sig Sauer P320 has a documented pattern of discharges—many occurring while holstered. Lawsuits are piling up, and the manufacturer continues to deny fault, but the incidents are too numerous, too consistent, and too dangerous to ignore.

In a city already struggling to staff its police force and control spiraling violence, CPD brass made the call: better to pull the plug than risk another injury or death. The P320 is now officially de-authorized.

But here’s the real gut punch: the officers themselves may be expected to foot the bill for replacing their sidearms. That’s right—these public servants, already asked to put their lives on the line, may now have to reach into their own modest uniform allowance to buy new duty weapons. A quality firearm will run close to $1,000, and that’s just the start. Each will require a fitted, holster—another hefty expense.

This decision, made at the top, may land hardest on young officers, those with families, or anyone already struggling to make ends meet. For them, this isn’t just an administrative change—it’s a financial crisis.

Meanwhile, Sig/Sauer remains knee-deep in litigation, fiercely defending a weapon that also happens to be the U.S. military’s standard issue. But for the boots on the ground in Chicago, the question isn’t about military contracts or legal spin—it’s about safety, survival, and now, personal sacrifice.

This controversy is far from over. And for the officers forced to pay the price—literally—it’s more than just a story. It’s a bitter reality.

Update:  Under the current fraternal order of police labor contract, the City of Chicago is required to cover the cost of a new service weapon if the police department deauthorizes a previously approved firearm. Officers are not financially responsible when the department mandates a change in duty weapons.  However, this is only for officers below the rank of Sergeant.  Calculating the average replacement weapon cost indicates the city will be paying upwards of $1 million to affect this change.  

Austin Metcalf, was it murder, or self-defense?

As a former police officer and a long-time private investigator specializing in use-of-force and self-defense cases, I have witnessed firsthand how quickly these situations escalate. When violent incidents occur, arrests are made, and I am often called to investigate on behalf of the accused and their legal teams. My work is rooted in a staunch belief in the Second Amendment and the fundamental right to self-defense.

Recently, a tragic incident occurred involving Austin Metcalf, a young white student who was fatally stabbed. Metcalf was known as a bright and dedicated student and a member of the football team. The altercation unfolded suddenly in the presence of his twin brother and several other white youths.

Karmelo Anthony, an African-American young man, has admitted to the stabbing, claiming it was an act of self-defense. On the surface, his self-defense claim appears somewhat plausible. A critical question arises: Why would a young black man initiate a conflict with a group of white youths when he would be significantly outnumbered? This scenario challenges conventional logic and warrants careful consideration.

The weight of the number of witnesses against Anthony appears overwhelming. However, it is crucial to assess whether these witnesses might also have been involved as potential aggressors. In my experience, it is not uncommon for group dynamics to complicate the perception of events, and witnesses are not always impartial. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that people may lie under oath more readily than in everyday conversations. The core question remains: Could this have been a case of self-defense? The answer is unequivocally yes – it is possible.

The media has portrayed Austin Metcalf as an exemplary young man, while the police have adhered to their typical protocol: arresting the survivor and designating the deceased as the victim. Ultimately, this matter will be resolved in a courtroom, where emotions, prejudices, and anger will be intensely examined. The trial will inevitably provoke debate over whether the process was fair, as the fundamental question will persist: Was it murder, or was it the result of a group attack on Karmelo Anthony?

It is essential to approach this case with objectivity and refrain from making premature judgments. Karmelo Anthony deserves a fair trial, and achieving that fairness will undoubtedly be challenging given the complex social dynamics and strong public sentiments surrounding the case.

Police Press release:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, April 2, 2025

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:    

Public Information Office    

972.292.6133    

fpdpio@friscotexas.gov

CALL FOR SERVICE #: 25039961

Frisco Police Investigate Fatal Stabbing, Suspect in Custody

FRISCO, TX – The Frisco Police Department is investigating a fatal stabbing, and the suspect is in custody.

On Wednesday, April 2, 2025, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Frisco Police and Fire responded to an incident at a track meet in the 6900 block of Stadium Lane.  An altercation between two students resulted in one stabbing the other. Despite lifesaving measures by police and fire personnel, including CPR and the administration of blood, the 16-year-old victim died.  

The suspect, identified as 17-year-old Karmelo Anthony of Frisco, is in custody and there is no further threat to the public.  He has been charged with Murder, a 1st Degree Felony.  No bond has been set at this time.

This is an active and ongoing investigation with resources from FPD’s School Resource Division, Patrol Division, and Criminal Investigations Division devoted to it.  Anyone with information is asked to contact the Frisco Police Department’s non-emergency number (972-292-6010) or submit a tip using Tip411 (text FRISCOPD + the tip to 847411).

The Frisco Police Department grieves with all those affected by this devastating loss and extends its deepest condolences to the victim’s family, students, and staff who are experiencing unimaginable pain. The department is collaborating with the Frisco Independent School District and will continue to provide any support they need during this incredibly difficult time.

The Mysterious Disappearance of Chicago’s Policewomen: Once Seen in Skirts, Now All Gone Without a Trace!

Once upon a time, Chicago had policewomen—real, skirt-wearing, gun-carrying women of the law. They weren’t the hardened patrol types, but they were there when needed. Their duties were almost always centered around dealing with women prisoners, abandoned children, or the offspring of arrested adults. The policewomen were corralled into the Youth Division, dealing with runaways and abused or delinquent kids. And yes, they were protected—zealously so. You wouldn’t catch one out on a midnight beat or in a dangerous situation. They had the same training and powers as their male counterparts and carried guns, but danger? Not on their watch.

Back then, the sight of a policewoman was as rare as a unicorn. In the 1960s and early ’70s, there were just 90 policewomen in a force of 14,000 men. Adding to the confusion were the “matrons”—female officers limited to tending women in lockups, sworn in but barred from carrying firearms. Their stylish uniforms, reminiscent of airline stewardesses, were adorned with the police star and patches, just enough to set them apart.

Gunfights? Almost unheard of. Only two stories stand out: One, a policewoman, Helen Dewitt caught a bullet in the calf while riding in a marked car around 1970, and the other—a legendary case—where one policewoman fired her service revolver at her detective husband. He was so terrified, he quit the department and moved to Las Vegas eventually became a celebrated screenwriter. The department, however, shrugged off the incident without disciplinary action.

It was a cushy gig—safe, secure, and decently paid. With only 90 positions available, job openings were rare, and competition was fierce. The most recent policewoman’s civil service exam saw 7,000 hopefuls vying for 30 positions that would open in the next decade. Naturally, those who made the cut were bright, better educated, and resourceful—intellectually a cut above many of their male colleagues. They were fast typists, sharp writers, and typically had their wits about them.

Then came the lawsuits. Equality was demanded. In the mid-1970s, the grand experiment began—integrating women into field patrols alongside men. Some women proved braver than their male counterparts, while others…not so much. But one thing was clear: their sharp minds often de-escalated situations where testosterone failed.

Soon after, the department gave policewomen the option to ditch their skirts and take on the title of “patrolman” (because “patrolwoman” wasn’t a thing yet). Most jumped at the opportunity, especially since it meant they could climb the ranks to sergeant, lieutenant, and beyond. From that point on, new academy classes were fully integrated, and women competed alongside men. However, as standards dropped to meet diversity and inclusion goals, gone were the intellectually superior, well-educated policewomen of the past.

Federal Judge Prentice Marshall’s ruling on civil service testing threw white males out of contention for appointments or promotions, ushering in a new era. The matron ranks also vanished, as they too were folded into the patrol division—despite never having fired a gun before. Many didn’t even own one! But training soon followed, and the matron role became a thing of the past.

Today, the department is a fully integrated mix of men, women, and now even transgender officers patrolling Chicago’s streets. As for those original policewomen? They faded away, one by one, through retirement and attrition, leaving behind only their stories and a few fleeting memories.

Oh, and in the end, four female Chicago police officers have lost their lives in the line of duty: Dorelle C. Brandon (1984), Irma Ruiz (1988), Ella Grace French (2021), and Areanah M. Preston (2023). But those brave souls were far from the skirted policewomen of old—they were the new breed, forged in the modern, integrated force. The skirts? Long gone.

Personally, I miss seeing some of the prettier Policewomen in those little pencil skirts and high heels.  

Americans have become astonishingly gullible and pathetically ignorant

The left-wing crybabies and their slobbering fake news lackeys are vomiting their deceitful propaganda, sending Wall Street investors into a panic. These shrieking fools have zero understanding of basic economics, yet they act like self-proclaimed experts, cluelessly sabotaging our nation’s progress.

Tariffs aren’t some evil invention—they’re a negotiation tool. The real crisis here is that almost every other nation has been gouging us with outrageous tariffs on American products for decades, while we sat back and let it happen. Year after year, Americans have been paying exorbitant prices for foreign imports because we didn’t have the spine to fight back.

I first saw the absurdity of it when I discovered that European car enthusiasts couldn’t afford the wildly popular, reasonably priced 1965 Ford Mustang. Why? Because those smug European nations slapped massive tariffs on our cars while we welcomed their imports with open arms. Our robust capitalist economy fueled sales of European cars here, but Europe didn’t reciprocate. Fair trade? Not even close.

Tariffs should be a two-way street, but America has let itself be walked on for endless decades. Meanwhile, we whine about drug prices and have been crippled by inflation since being sucker-punched by the Chinese virus. Enough is enough. Donald Trump is absolutely right—we need to flip the script on this one-sided trade imbalance, once and for all.

These new tariffs are just the opening move in a negotiation game. Tariffs can change with the stroke of a pen, and we’re not going to keep being the world’s doormat or the socialist nations’ endless ATM machine. After World War II, we rebuilt Europe and Japan with American tax dollars. Now, those same countries act like we owe them endless favors.

And the worst part? The treacherous left-wing traitors in our own country are desperately fear-mongering, hell-bent on sabotaging every effort Trump makes to restore American strength. Democrat politicians are nothing more than communist vandals using fear-mongering, and hysteria to undermine America.  Their existence as a party is an insult to our nation. It’s time to wake up and fight back against these domestic enemies.

If we allow Donald Trump to do his job, how nice it will be not to have to pay the confiscatory personal income tax.  Of course that will upset every accountant in our nation.  They need to remember that artificial intelligence is going to make them obsolete very soon.  

Big Pharma and Network TV News: A Match Made in Hell

Oh, network TV news. That bastion of truth, justice, and completely unbiased reporting. You know, the one that bombards you with endless stories about how the world is going to hell – right before cutting to a commercial about the latest miracle drug that might just send you there personally.

Yes, nothing screams credibility quite like your favorite talking head delivering doom and gloom, only to be immediately followed by a cheerful ad from Big Pharma. You know the ones – where they promise to fix your life-threatening ailment (or maybe just your slightly annoying rash) while whispering, oh-so-casually, that their wonder drug might also cause heart failure, sudden death, and a desire to howl at the moon.

But wait – it gets better. You can’t just stroll into Walgreens and demand this life-altering elixir. Nope. You’ve got to sweet-talk your doctor into writing a prescription. Fortunately, doctors are more than happy to help since Big Pharma hands out financial incentives like candy at a parade. Who knew curing people could be so lucrative?

Fast forward six months, and surprise! Your miracle cure turns out to be more of a nightmare. Cue the lawyer ads, proudly announcing that if you took this drug, you might be entitled to compensation – because who could have guessed that “may cause death” actually meant may cause death? More ad revenue, more lawsuits, more confusion. A perfect cycle of profit and pain.

But here’s the real kicker: Big Pharma’s obscene spending on TV ads is basically life support for network news. Without these lucrative deals, the so-called news would shrivel up like a forgotten houseplant. Imagine that – the propaganda machine grinding to a halt because their cash cow finally got put out to pasture.

Ah, but the first amendment – it’s a tricky little thing. Apparently, it protects drug ads but not cigarette or booze commercials. Go figure. RFK Jr. has been waving the flag to ban pharmaceutical ads, and honestly? Why not? Anything that makes network news sweat a little is worth the effort.

So, let’s raise a toast (to non-pharma-sponsored beverages) and dream of the day when TV news has to stand on its own – without Big Pharma cashing in on our health crises. Maybe then, they’ll actually report some real news. Or, more likely, just go broke trying. Either way, sounds like a win to me.

UPDATED: NYPD BLUE actress Kim Delaney, Booked for assault with a deadly weapon

Marina del Rey, CA – The tranquil morning air was shattered at approximately 10:15 AM as chaos erupted on the 14000 block of Marquesas Way. Responding to an urgent call, the LA County Sheriff’s Department raced to the scene of a heated domestic altercation involving none other than NYPD Blue actress Kim Delaney, 63, and James Morgan, 54.

Details remain murky, but the aftermath is undeniably dramatic: Delaney now faces the grave charge of felony assault with a deadly weapon, while Morgan has been slapped with a misdemeanor battery charge.

In a twist fit for a Hollywood thriller, the alleged weapon in question wasn’t a gun or a knife – but a motor vehicle, escalating the incident from domestic squabble to potential vehicular mayhem.  Morgan is rumored to be quite the cinematographer, having reportedly filmed Delaney’s epic chase scene with his smartphone.

Delaney was swiftly taken into custody, her freedom revoked, as she awaits her court appearance tomorrow morning at the LA County LAX Superior Court. The showdown is set for 8:30 AM in Department A, where the actress will face the harsh glare of justice.

Speculation swirls around the courthouse as legal experts predict a classic “he said, she said” battle. With both parties charged, it’s unlikely they’ll take the stand against each other. Cooler heads may ultimately prevail, and the saga may simmer down, but not before the story becomes the talk of Tinseltown – complete with scandal, whispered allegations, and more than a little embarrassment for all involved.

My only question now is who will be the lucky lawyer?  

UPDATE:  Oh, what a difference a day makes—just 24 little hours! Cooler heads have indeed prevailed, and in a plot twist worthy of a Hollywood drama, the LA County DA has officially bowed out of the action, citing—wait for it—insufficient evidence! That’s right, neither Delaney nor Morgan will be facing the courtroom spotlight.

But hold onto your popcorn, folks, because while the crime drama may have fizzled, the real show is just beginning. The Marriage Deathwatch has officially kicked off! Will love conquer all, or will this saga have more plot twists than a soap opera marathon? Stay tuned!