Having A Gun When Needed Stopped Bloodbath In West Hollywood

West Hollywood, CA-Four people were stabbed at a Target store here by a mentally disturbed woman. One victim remains in critical condition at a local hospital.

The woman, Layla Trawick, 34, entered the store and attacked shoppers with a butcher knife and a steak knife. It is now believed the knives came from the kitchenware section of the store.

The victims included a young mother holding her baby.

The unarmed security guards at Target could do little other than dialing 911 to summon police. I never understood the value of unarmed security guards. I guess the value of employee or customer’s lives, are of little concern of Target stores corporate bosses.

Also shopping in the store was off duty, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Deputy Clay Grant Jr. Grant was armed and interrupted the deadly assault. After two commands by Grant the woman dropped the knives and was taken into custody without further incident.

The reality is that without an armed response the woman would have been enabled to inflict more horror. It was indeed a rare event to see a cop when one was needed. Trained and armed citizens stop crimes like this somewhere every day in the states that allow for concealed weapon permits. Most often shots are never even fired by the gun carrying civilians. Thankfully the threat of deadly force is all that’s needed to stop most criminals.

We can’t predict where things like this quadruple stabbing will happen. A few state and local governments like Los Angeles enables this kind of violence because they criminalize self-defense through gun bans. Only the law-abiding bother to obey those gun laws.

Deputy Clay Grant, Jr. is a real hero today because he was armed and able to end this attack. Of course it would have been better if the attack was stopped before anyone was hurt.

Political Exploitation Of Victimization Never Ends With Poster Child Laws

A horrible crime happens usually with an unthinkable child murder. Some criminal is arrested and politicians scramble out from under their rocks for TV face time and votes.

The scenario is always the same. The criminal was well known and previously convicted of some other disgusting and despicable crime or crimes. He could have been locked away forever but some prosecutor, judge or both allowed the creep to return to society. The maniac goes out and does what was fully expected, committing a similar crime.

Laws are adequate but rapists, home invaders and child molesters manage to get short prison stays.

The politicians including prosecutors and members of the legislature suggest yet another law named after some poor dead child that will never be fully enforced.

The politicians dress up the parents of the victim and put on a revolting dog and pony show for the press. They make a poster child out of the victim and faux heroes of the grieving parents. Yes, the same parents that did a poor job of protecting their child in the first place. Please excuse me while I go vomit.

Far too often the new poster child law disables Constitutional protections created by our founding fathers to protect the innocent. The poster child laws simply strengthen the police state and make things easy for dishonest or lazy prosecutors to convict anyone they please.

The victimized parents that are exploited are led to believe that some other children are suddenly safer but the end result is only free publicity for incumbent or rising politicians. The collective intelligence of Americans is somewhere in the toilet because they fall for it every time. American mothers wring their hands and cry watching the courageous politicians making us all safe. Wake up ladies! You’ve been had!

The biggest disappointment is the allegedly educated people in the media that never miss a chance to help sensationalize the proposed poster child law as the fix of all times. Are they so stupid they can’t see the scam?

Don’t Confuse Being Anti-Obama With Anti-Government

Washington, DC—The Socialists that are currently in power want to brand anyone who disagrees with their Marxist agenda as anti-government.

What these people are doing to our government destroying its very foundation so they can replace it with another Socialist model that’s doomed to redundant holocausts and failure.

Our government and its foundation have been hijacked and the Constitution ignored. Barack Obama has lost any hope of gaining respect, and recognition as a valid Commander in Chief. Obama is an enemy of the United States government and its taxpayers.

Obama is a despot office holder until he’s removed.

American patriots love their country and government. Americans have an absolute duty to forcibly resist Socialism in every form in order to preserve their government.

Freedom, free enterprise and the American way of life is worth our fighting and dying to protect. These are non-negotiable matters. If the Socialists want to dominate us, that’s nothing less than an act of war against the American people.

Immigration Enforcement, Racism And Humanity

Phoenix, AZ—My long time friend Arizona State Senator Russ Pearce’s bill to make Illegal immigrants illegal was not some extremist or racist act. That bill is law now and the Leftists are fighting mad.

The pure and simple fact is a vast majority of American voters want the border closed and the trespassers removed from our soil. It’s about economics and the threat to liberty, not racism. Mexico exports crime, poverty and drugs to our country. They are not sending us their doctors, teachers or engineers.

Most Conservatives I know are incredibly sympathetic to the plight of immigrants who take risks to pursue the American dream. Nearly all the immigrants are trying to flee from failed leftist nations.

It’s not the Latinos that are hated by Americans but the governments they flee from. Those Socialist banana republics are anything but bastions of freedom or free enterprise. They are corrupt Leftist nations that maintain power through keeping their people ignorant and poor. Most immigrants are in fact legitimate refugees.

These poor folks want work but they know that their lack of skills and education will bar them from affording medical care or babysitting/education for their children in America. They are also well aware of the relative ease of entitlement theft through immigration fraud. The lure to break our immigration laws is incredibly strong.

Instead of opening our doors to a never ending stream of ignorant and poor we should be assisting these people in the overthrow of their own governments.

These refugees must realize their own power to create their own Mexican Dream in a land of the free. The same problems exist in nearly all of Central and South America. These horrible governments are allowed and encouraged stifle productivity, and freedom.

The Latino refugees need to focus their efforts and energy on dealing with the problems in their own countries instead of invading ours. If they accomplished what they should, the immigration problems would end or even reverse. Imagine if Mexico had the kind of limited government our founding fathers gave us? They'd need fences to keep the Gringos out!

We have a government foundation the Leftists hate and continually destroy. As they criticize the few freedoms we have left, America is still a huge draw for millions of people from all over the world yearning to be free. The Leftists want to make America just like the countries the refugees are fleeing from.

We have more than enough day laborers, bus boys and other unskilled workers. The illegal immigrants are competing with Americans and legal immigrants for the few jobs available. Illegal immigration threatens our way of life and must be stopped cold.

The poor immigrants need real help and that is aid, education and enablement to go back and fight for their own freedom. Mexico has every great natural resource we do and there is no excuse for failure at self-government. FREEDOM IS NEVER FREE, IT IS ONLY EARNED BY THE BLOODSHED OF PATRIOTS.

Official Crimefile Pistol Review Of The HK 45 in .45 ACP

Click on picture to enlarge!


Chicago, IL—Where else should I review a pistol but where they’re outlawed in the Windy City. When you’re in Chi-Town you’ve got to remember the cops are demoralized, outgunned and undermanned. Chicago’s draconian gun laws have established that local thugs have guns and are in control. That’s the sad situation while the law-abiding folks are sitting ducks, waiting for victimization.

In Chicago you need a gun that means business so why settle for anything less than a full size .45? If you’re going to pack a .45 it should be user friendly, and engineered to neutralize the recoil.

Most self-defense shootings happen in low light so night sights are important. Another consideration is that you may have multiple assailants and magazine capacity becomes critical. The HK 45 in .45 ACP has what you need.

Next, the heft, weight and feel of your pistol are important. Personally I have a fondness for the 1911, and the Sig P220 pistols. I’m not enamored with the Glock 21because of the trigger engineering. The full size HK 45 model weighs in at just under, 31 ounces.

Price is my least concern when it comes to survival I know I’m worth whatever I must pay to have the best. Of course spending money on fine guns is no substitute for adequate training and regular practice. To survive an armed confrontation you need, skill, a reliable firearm and luck.

I was never a real fan of the HK USP models that were lesser evolved products than the HK 45. This gun was to compete for a replacement military sidearm because decades later the Beretta 92F, 9MM pistols are far too lame for combat duty. The government canceled the project but HK had their entry ready to go.

The HK 45 is a superior product in every detail. The one I tested is the full sized model but there is a compact model too. The pistol can be modified by the owner to double action only that has been required by so many law enforcement agencies. This also comes with an accessory rail for tactical lights and Lazar sights.

The owner has the ability to configure the grip with a second choice of grip panel. All hands were not made equal so HK provided some help in this area.

If you live in one of the many, liberty loving states that allow silencers you can purchase an additional barrel threaded for the suppressor. Also available is a set of high profile sights that will rise above the larger diameter of your silencer. Why contribute to noise pollution and disturb your neighbors?

The standard magazine holds 10 rounds but seems to invite yet an additional round. Over stuffing the magazine with an additional round is asking for trouble since it will affect the gun’s reliability.

Shooting this gem is a pleasure. The trigger is so smooth and the let-off is really crisp. The recoil is incredibly manageable compared to other similar pistols. My overall rating for this product is absolutely magnificent.

Violent Resistance To Obama’s Socialist Revolution Is Pure Patriotism

Ann Arbor, MI—Barack Obama slammed his critics here during a speech today suggesting that their tough talk incites violence and closes the door to compromise. Obama must live in Fantasyland, because when it comes to hard won liberty and freedom there is no compromise.

Obama is a total Marxist that follows, emulates and force feeds America his anti-Constitution and anti-American agenda. Everything Obama has done comes from Karl Marx and the Socialist agenda for a one world Socialist government.

Americans have every right in using whatever means necessary including deadly violence to protect and defend liberty. If Obama and his minions don’t like that reality and challenges Americans through a Socialist revolution he and his followers do so at their peril.

Yes, Americans have the right to end the reign of a despot outside of the election process if that becomes necessary. Adolph Hitler had the support of a majority of Germany, was it then somehow morally wrong for people to try and kill him?

There were 5000 German resisters arrested, tried in sham courts and murdered by the Third Reich. Today the National Socialist resistance members are recognized as genuine patriots for plotting violence against a popular dictator.

Obama does not come close to enjoying the popularity Hitler had. Hitler had the new media of radio as did Josef Stalin, Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt. That was an unstoppable one sided propaganda tool that brainwashed the people in those respective countries.

No politician will ever be able to control the information again in our world.

Obama has crossed the edge several times since taking office. Perhaps if he does not like the rhetoric out there he needs to be more respectful of the oath he took or face unthinkable consequences. There are patriots willing to do what’s necessary to protect the Constitution and the American way of life. Some of them are Secret Service agents.

It’s Too Rich, Obama Doin’ the Tiger Thing!

Washington, DC—Say it ain’t so! Barack Obama caught with his pants down? Enquiring minds want to know!

Yep the National Enquirer is already up for a Pulitzer Prize for catching former VP candidate John Edwards with his fly open. Now it looks like catching Comrade Obama in flagrante delicto will win them another one for sure.

The bait for this hot badger game is allegedly a dedicated Obama campaign fund raiser, 35 year-old Vera Baker. The crime scene is the Hotel George.
The tabloid claims million dollar money offers are being made everywhere to buy silence. The big problem is a pesky security video. Apparently it was a limo driver that spilled the beans.

I hope the secret Service boys are on their toes because Michelle Obama may be swinging blunt instruments and throwing knives at the Chockalott Jesus. I’d hate to see a state funeral because they were asleep at the wheel!

Read all about it here!

Why Concealed Carry Is Right For Europe

Europe—Europe has a fascinating law-abiding substantial majority today. Europeans have amazing respect for all laws big and small. The timing is everything as crime rates now change for the worse.

Criminals here are particularly ruthless. Many criminals are coming from countries where respect for law is miniscule like the former Soviet Union. The Socialist run nations criminalized everything they could as a revenue tool. That destroyed respect for law in general.

Violence in Europe is on the increase and cannot be controlled by police especially in free societies. Committed and competent help needs to come from ordinary citizens.

The only meaningful way to stop in-progress crimes is with the threat of force or actual force. Superior manpower or firearms are the only resources that work to prevent imminent death or destruction. Just the threat of force nearly always works without injury. Except in rare circumstances, the cowardly criminals stop in their tracks or try to escape. Rarely is a single shot ever fired once an intended victim produces a gun. Peace is restored without injury or death.

Self-defense is nonexistent for those that cannot have the advantage of a weapon and several hours of training. Violent and early mortality can be avoided. Carrying a gun provides the same kind of advantage as wearing a seat belt while driving.

I carry a gun every day of my life. I wear a seat belt every time I drive. For me these things are automatic. I can say I’m alive today because I carried a gun. I have never been in a serious enough auto accident to claim a seat belt saved me from death or serious injury. I will still wear the seat belt as I pack my .45 automatic anyway.

The UK police make a big deal out of arming their officers. The government officials give their officers with weapons training initials to sign after their name just like they earned a PhD! Yes, that’s ridicules. The officers with that designation strut around like very important peacocks. The royally privileged and armed police then zealously set about to insure that only they be armed. How sickeningly repugnant is that?

The fact is, the members of society that need the firearm protection goes without and are at the mercy or lack of it displayed by the rapists, robbers and killers. The government holds down the law-abiding citizen until the thugs finish their acts. The government becomes parties and accomplices to the crimes.

Police always arrive after the fact, unable to arrest but simply to deal with the mops, buckets and report process. If the cops get lucky they will catch the most incompetent criminals that don’t know how to cover their tracks. Serial murderers are rarely captured by police. Their intended victims or armed people close to the victims actually have a much better capability to stop these killers.

As the crime rates increase in Europe the criminals will become bolder and unstoppable. This road to ruin can be stopped with trained armed citizens with the right to use reasonable force to stop victimization. Yes, the law-abiding can be trusted with firearms. We also know that convicted criminals cannot.

Gun training is important but the graduates need no initials after their names, just the right to be free from violent attack.

Europe simply needs to look at the statistics from the states in the USA that have concealed carry. Those who get the training and special permits are almost never found on the wrong side of the law. The very few who do break the law violence and firearms are never involved.

Justice Department Conspired, Not The Hutaree Militia

Detroit, MI—As the Barack Obama Administration controls the Justice Department this kind of despot law enforcement was anticipated.

The Whitehouse wants to intimidate and bully those who’d dare resist the Obama Socialist Revolution. How better to do so, than to label dissidents as terrorists and destroy their lives with raids, arrests and prosecutions.

What’s left of the discredited and doomed mainstream media better known as the, Obama Propaganda Ministry was quick to rewrite and publish the Justice Department press releases on the recent militia raids and arrests. This propaganda was to help with the Obama intimidation program aimed at dissidents.

Now comes the hard part, producing real evidence. Let’s start with the so-called illegal weapons. Weeks later the FBI claims they’re still testing the firearms and don’t know if they’re illegal. That’s beyond lame and an admission that the firearms were in fact legal.

It turns out they have some verbal exchanges among the members of the so-called Hutaree militia exchanging half-hearted, big talk about what they think the politicians and bureaucrats deserve for their treason.

There were no specific threats or plans to actually do anything at all but talk. Considering that paid informants infiltrated the group any of the braggadocio was undoubtedly inspired by the snitches sent to entrap them.

The FBI wants to keep the arrested dissidents behind bars in Detroit. The Whitehouse, Justice Department and FBI knows that any Detroit trial will have a super-majority African-American jury enamored Barack Obama. They will deliberate with hate against anyone that dislikes their Messiah and evidence won’t matter.

There is a conspiracy alright and that’s to violate the rights of any and all dissidents they can.

Now the problematic nature of the case is surfacing as U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts’ questions about real evidence are going unanswered. The judge must decide if the nine defendants should be allowed to remain free pending the prosecution that may take as long as two years.

I can’t predict the ultimate outcome of this case since reverse race hatred, political competition and other factors are so heavily involved. The Justice department would have never pulled this stunt in an Area where jury panels would be not be stuffed with entitlement addicted Obama supporters.

I expect the Whitehouse and their goons to go after bloggers, radio show hosts and individual gun collectors that don’t share Obama’s hatred for the U.S. Constitution.

Some Americans will rightfully perceive government’s lawless and forceful political action an act of war and act accordingly.

Let me say this, Americans will never stand for another Waco assault on liberty. Government agents sent to victimize Americans will find themselves covered in their own blood. Millions of Americans are angry and willing to shed blood in order to preserve Liberty and the United States Constitution.

Update: On 3 May Judge Roberts ordered the defendats free peding further proceedings. The judge further indicated that the FBI's evidence was lacking.

Hollywood Is In A Creative Depression

Los Angeles, CA—Where are they? Where are the films that you really want to see? The compelling stories brought to the silver screen that have any relevance to our lives aren’t being made anymore.

Animations, robots, and comedies that barely make us chuckle are wasting space at the cinema’s. Gone are compelling stories of real heroes, courtroom dramas or historical events.

Personally, I want more actor driven films without the ridicules special effects that are just silly and not believable.

When I was visiting the Bendlerblock military compound in Berlin last November, I found 5000 stories there waiting to be told. That is where Col. Clause Von Stauffenberg and others planned the bombing attempt on Adolph Hitler’s life. Today a portion of that facility houses the German Resistance Museum. The stories here of of the heroes that were arrested tried and executed for resisting Adolph Hitler and the devastation he brought down on the German people. The stories documented there are all incredibly compelling and full of adrenalin fueled intrigue.

Nearly every courthouse in the entire world has those stories of justice served or gone wrong that would inspire, thrill and entertain moviegoers. Many of the best stories are long forgotten but none the less powerful and relevant to our lives.

Great films are out there that are not vehicles of the obvious product placement spam, action figures and the rest of the crap we did not spend our money to see.

My own film about recruit Chicago policewoman Ann Leybourne’s ending a career serial rapist’s reign of terror over the city’s North Side would put viewers on the edge of their seats. One beautiful young ingénue selected for brutal victimization by a cunning criminal was able to accomplish what Paul Kersey or Dirty Harry Callahan could only do in fictional thrillers. This film, COME FRIDAY is not so expensive to produce but will captivate and inspire the audience.

Every week I look for new movies and released DVD’s but can’t seem to find anything worthy of two hours and the price of a ticket. The Hollywood investors have never had a better opportunity to make quality films with so much expensive garbage out there. They just have look beyond the talent agencies that have lost their magic.

Film investors need to find a great story, land a decent director and avoid input from the large talent agencies their bad ideas that have not been working. Making films that’s actor driven is what movie goers really want.

Here is a great film waiting to be made that moviegoers are waiting to see. .

African-American Murder Culture Plagues Chicago

Chicago, IL—I’ve heard every excuse for crime by Chicago’s African-Americans for more than four decades. That, as their despicable deeds causes them to overflow from the jails and prisons of Illinois.

The unimaginable, constant and senseless murders by African-Americans are are rarely seen in the White communities. These murders are incredibly cruel and depraved for the most part. Most of Chicago’s violent crime is Black on Black followed by Black on White. The rarest crime in Chicago is White on Black.

Thoughtless, violent depravity has become a way of life for young Black males. You may argue that poverty causes the hungry to steal but these savages are not hungry. Their only hunger is simply to inflict massive indiscriminate suffering on others. Far too many African-Americans just don’t respect the value of human life.

Our polite society has chosen to cover-up this horrible cultural behavior and instead assigns this unilaterally to all Chicagoans. To talk about the racial aspects of crime is somehow considered racist if spoken about by a White person.

The murders of African-Americans by African-Americans in Chicago, is genocide. Exposing and condemning this behavior is not any form of racism but a reasonable response to the unleashed horror.

We cannot begin to treat or cure the horror if we choose to politely pretend this is not an African-American cultural behavior. Somehow this mutant form of life must be reprogrammed back into the human race. Enablement through tolerance and excuses for this behavior will never repair anything. The greatest form of racism is acceptance and tolerance of this culture of violence.

Fearing and avoiding African-Americans by Whites is not racism in Chicago but a normal instinct for survival. This behavior is a public relations nightmare for those well-behaved African-Americans. Okay folks, how do we fix this mess?

The Final Solution To Chicago’s Street Thug Problem

Chicago, IL—Rising unemployment, prisoner releases, and temperatures along with a vastly undermanned, poorly armed and demoralized police department means armed thugs will own Chicago's streets this summer.

Horrible street crimes such as the recent, near fatal baseball bat beating of two pretty young women and the brutal fatal stabbing of a tourist by the Michigan Avenue Bridge are a rapidly growing intolerable threat.

Brain-dead politicians are demanding National Guardsmen get deployed to the inner city to combat the problem. That idea is unworkable.

Chicago has nothing to lose in trying a better idea. They can immediately end the gun prohibition they will lose anyway in the next 60 days because of the McDonald ruling that’s pending before the Supreme Court.

Right now the gun bans only work against the law-abiding folks that obey them. Police can't simply start searching everyone like they do at airports. Criminals are free to roam the streets with all the guns they can fit under their baggy jeans.

The City of Chicago has had 30 years of gun bans that have never done for public safety what the politicians promised. Gun bans are the problem, not the solution. Why deprive people of the means to defend themselves?

The Illinois Legislature can amend the Unlawful Use of A Weapon Statute to exempt those with a valid Illinois Firearms Owners Identification Card from arrest for carrying a concealed weapon. They can also require the FOID card WITH a security guard blue firearms training card or a certificate of training from a state, local or federal law enforcement training academy, or personal protection/Basic Pistol firearms course offered by the NRA.

Illinois should also recognize valid concealed weapon permits issued by any state within the United States.

Chicago’s street thugs would finally be on notice that the state or local government will no longer enable their violence. These cowards can be stopped, but only through a partnership between law-abiding people and the police. The people of the state of Illinois and Chicago deserve what they don’t have right now, meaningful protection.

Another Excellent Adventure For Crimefile

Chicago, IL—For nearly a year I’ve been investigating a horrendous and notorious criminal case filed against a Chicago cop. When he was arrested five years ago the media swarmed all over this high profile case. The cop’s reputation and standing in the community was absolutely destroyed.

When I was asked to look into the case by a cop friend of 40 years, I soon learned that the accused cop’s defense lawyer had been barred from the practice of law and was still practicing anyway.

Eventually I learned the cop was absolutely innocent and nothing more than the victim of typical Cook County corruption shenanigans. The investigation by Chicago police detectives and internal affairs was the worst I’d seen in 40 years inside the Criminal Justice System.

The pretend lawyer was trying to force the accused cop into a guilty plea and felony conviction. The pretend lawyer never bothered to do anything but manage to get the case endlessly continued for over four years.

The cop fired the pretender and retained one of the country’s better criminal lawyers and on Monday we will finally begin trial. I don’t know how long this trial will last but I’ve never been so sure of how it will end. I will be there in court for the duration.

I can’t give any details now but stay tuned, this will unfold right here once the case gets resolved. I am convinced that the cop will be cleared and his pension will be protected.

The Soviet Rape Of Berlin’s Women And Children

Berlin, Germany—The people of Berlin were law-abiding, moral and hard working folks. They suffered through one war that ended in a peace treaty rather than occupation. Aside from the wicked death toll, food shortages and economic collapse the people of Berlin were simply genuine victims of the world’s despot politicians.

Adolph Hitler, a Socialist politician promised the German people, Hope and Change. Hitler was competing with the Communists for control. History shows both political parties were miserable Socialist tyrants. Germany’s people went on to lose nine million souls through war, bombing and political murder. That does not include the six million souls murdered at Nazi concentration camps or during transport.

The German people like everyone were optimistic their leader would be a paternal icon that would deliver them from their suffering. Like today’s American politicians Hitler deceived the people that supported him.

Hitler knew full well that even the most anti-Semitic German people would never support his unbridled slaughter of Jews. That was a carefully guarded State Secret and bureaucrats that knew referred to the murder program in polite coded terms, “The Final Solution.”

The German people suffered constantly from World War One until well beyond the Second World War’s end in 1945. The occupation by foreign Armies was brutal. Random warrantless searches and thefts of personal property were a German's constant companion. Soldiers and bureaucrats simply moved into every nice home they could find evicting the occupants.

Berlin was subjected to special horrors since the Soviets conquered this once thriving capital city. The Bolshevik Army simply took the women and children as sex slaves. They raped and raped with unbridled brutality and this just went unchecked. Most women in Berlin had lost their male family members and there was nobody left to protect them. The few men left in Berlin were deprived of their wives, daughters and sisters by rapists sanctioned by the Russian government.

In desperation German women had to resign themselves along with all their dignity and adapt to their new lives. Many women learned their only salvation was to try and pick a single strong Russian soldier to service so they were not constantly gang raped. The women found it was better to be the property of just one rapist.

The Allies divided Berlin into four sectors. The Russians, Americans, French and Brits each owned a piece of Berlin. The Rape in the Russian zone never really ended until the Berlin Wall came down 20 years ago November 9th.

The Western sectors of Berlin were cut off from every form of food, supplies and heating fuel by the Soviets whose new territory surrounded the city. Berliners are still grateful today to the Americans that risked their lives flying in food and needed supplies to them during the Cold War's Berlin Airlift.

The German people slowly were allowed to go about their business in peace and rebuild. With American help West Berlin regained its charm beauty and culture. The occupation ended and Germany today is a powerful friend and NATO member.

Yes it’s true, I hate Communists and Socialists more every day. They are the Parties of Murder. People acting under the color of these governments have a record of non-stop killing and horror. We must end their hold on America through whatever means we have. Socialists are an evil cancer that must be cut out or we will face the horrors they always unleash for certain.

The Berlin atrocities and War Crimes committed by the Russian pigs went unpunished, but the tragic memories of the now elderly women, is still there.

The Cult Of Obama To Force Illegal Alien Amnesty Down America’s Throat Now

Washington, DC—In light of Arizona’s making illegal aliens illegal Barack Obama and his Marxist cronies are in a panic. They know that statistics of cost savings will prove the real burden taxpayers have because of open borders. Immigration laws non-enforcement has put our healthcare and schools straight into bankruptcy. Arizona is bound to get some quick taxpayer relief because of their new state law.

The constant Central and South American export of crime, poverty and drugs will slow down in Arizona. This new Arizona law will definitely push California into more fiscal chaos and deeper insolvency as the illegal immigrants abuse entitlements in that formerly golden state.

Socialism can only exist where the majority of the population is completely dependent on government handouts. Obama’s band of Marxists know they are very close to their goals and with just a little more voter fraud they can get absolute and permanent power.

The majority in our Congress are desperate to give America another forced feeding of the Marxism they don’t want. These traitors are Hell bent on creating The Socialist states of America before voters get a chance to boot them out of office.

We have to punish the Marxists in our government in every way possible. We have to make things uncomfortable and dangerous for them as we can before they do much worse to us

Today’s Violent Criminals Escape Justice By Simply Crossing State Lines

Phoenix, AZ—As Phoenix police officers discover and arrest violent fugitives wanted in other states they get a rude surprise. The state that originated the warrants now tells them, “Keep him we don’t want him.”

Kidnappers, child molesters, robbers and burglars are escaping justice. Why you ask? It’s because, state and local governments are too cash poor to pay for the high cost of extradition.

Theft and drug offenders wanted for probation violations are getting a free ride most of the time. The best thing you can say to the fugitives leaving your jurisdiction today is good riddance.

The pay back for this kind of enforcement is brutal. Rather than clean up their act many of these felons graduate to even more serious crimes. The most glaring example is the fugitive that recently murdered four cops in the state of Washington.

Those felons that remain furthest away from the state they are wanted always stand a better chance of escaping the not-so-long arm of the law and avoiding incarceration.

This seems like a throwback to yesteryear when leaving state jurisdiction meant the end of the hunt by police. Extradition was not nearly automatic as it is today. Modern federal flight laws and better Governor’s extradition agreements insured there was no escape for criminals.

Of course there will still be the special criminals that catch the attention of the media or police administrators. Being a celebrity like Roman Polanski will get you extradited from anywhere since cops and prosecutors are star struck. I don’t think Lt. Phillip Gerard would ever let Dr. Richard Kimball escape even with a tight budget. The sad part of that story as we all know, Kimball was innocent!

Being an Illegal Alien In Arizona Is Now Illegal

Phoenix, AZ—With our medical care facilities and schools overwhelmed with trespassers from all of Central and South America and we are in a major crisis. Adding to the fact that jobs being held by American citizens and lawful immigrants are rapidly vanishing, the people of Arizona are under attack.

Arizona Senator Russ Pearce introduced legislation to help our federal government with the mission they’ve been unable or unwilling to do. That legislation passed both Houses and has been signed by Governor Jan Brewer. Police can now arrest these trespassers on state charges if they dare set foot in Arizona.

The illegal aliens already in Arizona can alleviate the threat of arrest and imprisonment by simply going away. That’s really very simple.

President Barack Obama in violation of his oath has openly favored the current policy of not enforcing existing laws. Obama has now attacked Arizona for taking action to remedy the problem.

I’m proud to have known Russ Pearce since he was a young Maricopa County deputy sheriff 33 years ago. I’ve also known Jan Brewer for at least 30 years and found her to be a freedom loving Conservative American.

The Leftists want what they call, Immigration Reform. That misleading title is bogus. Their idea of reform is the simple repeal of existing immigration laws and amnesty. We have a legitimate system for immigration that overwhelmingly favors the ignorant, and entitlement hungry from our Southern border. That over educated, English speaking people from Europe we know will never be a burden to taxpayers.

We should realize a substantial Arizona entitlement tab drop along with those unpaid hospital bills and public school enrolment. Those statistics may reveal just how expensive open borders are to taxpayers.
Our neighbors south of the border have only exported crime, poverty and drugs to Arizona and the United States.

Barack Obama is by far the largest threat America has ever faced to its Constitution and way of life. Obama is Public Enemy #1. All Americans have a duty to rid ourselves of Obama and his Socialist cronies or we will deserve what we get.

Sit back and watch my long time friend Frank Camacho report on this new law at the State Capital.

Blago About To Receive A Get Out Of Jail Free Card?

Chicago, IL—We know that Barack Obama controls the US Attorney and has the votes in Congress to obstruct any investigation of his own political corruption.

The inconvenient indictment and pending prosecution of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is now a genuine threat to the Presidency. Sealed court information has been leaked and now Obama’s own criminal conduct has been exposed. All the King’s horses and all the King’s men won’t save the Messiah’s skin. That is of course if the case against Blago moves forward.

Obama’s supporters are in a deep cult induced denial that their Messiah would do anything wrong. They want to believe they’re being led to the Promised Land. I guess the new arrivals at the Auschwitz Concentration Camp wanted to believe that they were only being led to a harmless shower too. Being optimistic is all very understandable but often fatal.

Blago has laid his cards on Obama’s table demanding his right to subpoena witnesses for his defense. Obama has too much to hide and he knows it. There is only one answer for Obama, and that’s to find a graceful way to make Blago disappear or at least the criminal case against him.

Blago has had that Ace up his sleeve from day one. Will it be a contrived technical glitch that frees Blago? Will it be a Presidential Pardon that does the trick? Or will someone just kill the former governor to shut him up for good?

Let me make my prediction that this prosecution is about to be interrupted by the fickle finger of fate or at least an Ace up Blago’s sleeve.

Blago Now Has A Price On His Head For Sure

Chicago, IL—An analysis of the latest filing by the defense attorneys representing former Governor Rod Blagojevich reveals there exists evidence of direct and sinister conduct by President Barack Obama.

The Ward Room has uncovered damning information in the filing that should cause the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to look into the role Obama played in selling his old senate seat.

Rod Blagojevich is in real and mortal danger of being liquidated to silence him and prevent his testimony.

Read what the WARD ROOM has to say here!


Oooops! Read the motion that saw sunlight!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. ) 08CR888
)
) Judge James B. Zagel
ROD BLAGOJEVICH )
MOTION FOR THE COURT TO ISSUE A TRIAL SUBPOENA TO
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Now Comes Defendant Rod Blagojevich, by and through his counsels and hereby
requests this court issue a subpoena ad testificandum for President Barack Obama. In support of
said motion, defendant states the following:1
1. President Barack Obama was elected November 4, 2008 and was inaugurated January
20, 2009. Before being elected President, Mr. Obama was a United States Senator
from Illinois.
2. As a result of the election of Mr. Obama, his Senate seat was open for appointment by
Governor Rod Blagojevich.
3. The charges against Mr. Blagojevich stem from his appointment of President-elect
Obama’s vacated Senate seat.
4. According to media reports, President Obama was interviewed by two United States
attorneys and two FBI agents for two hours.2
1 Although it is the defense’s position that all tapes and sealed information be made public, to comply with the
Protective Order of April 14, 2009, portions that contain sealed information provided by the government have been
redacted. The defense, however, urges this Court unseal the entire motion. See, this court’s order dated April 14,
2010 (document 305) “Redaction, in cases where the redacted words are relevant to the case and considered in
reaching a decision, is still permitted but discouraged.” See In re Krynicki, 983 F.2d 74, 75 (7th Cir. 1992)
(“Information that is used at trial or otherwise become the basis of decision enters the public record.”) (citation
omitted). The case for redaction has to be proven not presumed. ... But it is clear that the remedy to the objection
that a portion of a statement may be misleading to the public (and the jury pool) is not redaction but disclosure of the
omitted portion. Disclosure of written material a month and a half before the beginning of trial does not come close
to presenting a significant threat that a fair jury cannot be found. The experience of the courts in cases which attract
significant news coverage has shown that pretrial news reporting is an overstated menace to fair jury trials.”
2 “Barack Obama questioned by FBI agents over Blagojevich Illinois senate seat scandal”, Toby Harnden, The
Telegraph, December 26, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 11
2
5. On December 19, 2009, the defense filed a Motion for Discovery. In that motion, the
defense requested all notes, transcripts, and reports generated from the government’s
interview of President Barack Obama.
6. As of today’s date, the defense has not received any notes, transcripts, or reports from
President Obama’s interview with the government.
7. The government alleges that Defendant Rod Blagojevich met “with a labor union
official who he believed to be in contact with the President-elect in regard to the
vacant Senate seat, and suggested to the labor union official that Rod Blagojevich
would appoint Senate Candidate B to the vacant Senate seat in exchange for Rod
Blagojevich being named Secretary of Health and Human Services.” (Indictment p.
101, para. 10(c)).
8. President Obama has stated publicly that he was “confident that no representatives of
mine would have any part of any deals3 related to this seat.”4
9. Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of
any deals, labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he
spoke to labor union official on November 3, 2008 who received a phone message
from Obama that evening. After labor union official listened to the message
labor union official told labor union president “I’m the one”. Labor union
president took that to mean that labor union official was to be the one to deliver
the message on behalf of Obama that Senate Candidate B was his pick. (Labor
union president 302, February 2, 2009, p. 7).
10. Labor union official told the FBI and the United States Attorneys “Obama expressed
his belief that [Senate Candidate B] would be a good Senator for the people of
Illinois and would be a candidate who could win re-election. [Labor union
official] advised Obama that [labor union official] would reach out to Governor
Blagojevich and advocate for [Senate Candidate B].. . . [Labor union official]
called [labor union president] and told [labor union president] that Obama was
aware that [labor union official] would be reaching out to Blagojevich.” (Labor
union official 302, February 3, 2009 p. 3).
3 Deal is defined as a “transaction; bargain; contract; an arrangement for mutual advantage.” Merriam-Webster
Online Dictionary. A deal requires two willing participants.
4 President-elect Barack Obama press conference, December 11, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 2 of 11
3
11. According to Senate Candidate B, on November, 4 2008, Senate Candidate B
spoke with labor union official about the Senate seat. Labor union official said
he spoke to Obama. Labor union official said he was going to meet with
Blagojevich and said “he was going to push Blagojevich hard on this. According
to Senate Candidate B, labor union official’s language could have been stronger
than the language that she was reporting to the government.” (Senate Candidate
B 302, December 19, 2008).
12. On November 5, 2008, Blagojevich told John Harris that labor union official “talked
to Barack Obama, wants to come and see me.” Blagojevich then told Harris that
labor union official “was very explicit with me, “I talked to Barack about the
Senate seat. Can I come and see ya? Can I do it tomorrow?’ I said, sure.”
(Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 261).
13. A supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama suggested that she talk to the wife of
Governor Blagojevich about Senate Candidate B for Senator. (Valerie Jarrett
302, December 19, 2008). Supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama is
mentioned in a phone call on November 3, 2008, having offered “fundraising” in
exchange for Senate Candidate B for senator (Blagojevich Home Phone Call #
149).
14. President Obama has direct knowledge to allegations made in the indictment. In
addition, President Obama’s public statements contradict other witness statements,
specifically those made by labor union official and Senate Candidate B. It is
anticipated that labor union official will be a witness for the government. His
accounts of events directly related to the charges in the indictment are contradicted by
President Obama’s public statement.
15. Even the prosecutor in this case indicated “there’s no allegation that the presidentelect
– there’s no reference in the complaint to any conversations involving presidentelect
or indicating that the president-elect was aware of it.”5
16. There are two conflicting stories and the defense has the right to admit evidence that
contradicts the government’s claims. Only President Obama can do this.
17. President-elect Obama also spoke to Governor Blagojevich on December 1, 2008
in Philadelphia. On Harris Cell Phone Call # 139, John Harris and Governor’s
legal counsel discuss a conversation Blagojevich had with President-elect
5
“Fitzgerald Press Conference on Blagojevich. Transcript.” Chicago Sun Times, Lynn Sweet, December 9, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 3 of 11
4
Obama. The government claims a conspiracy existed from October 22, 2008
continuing through December 9, 2008.6 That conversation is relevant to the defense
of the government’s theory of an ongoing conspiracy. Only Rod Blagojevich and
President Obama can testify to the contents of that conversation. The defense is
allowed to present evidence that corroborates the defendant’s testimony.7
18. President-elect Obama also suggested Senate Candidate A to Governor Blagojevich.
John Harris told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to
President’s Chief of Staff on November 12, 2008. Harris took notes of the
conversation and wrote that President’s Chief had previously worked as
Blagojevich's press secretary. Obama agreed of Staff told Harris that Senate
Candidate A was acceptable to Obama as a senate pick. (Harris handwritten
notes, OOG1004463) President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that “he could not
say where but somewhere it was communicated to him that” Senate Candidate A
was a suggested candidate viewed as one of the four “right” candidates “by the
Obama transition team.” (Rahm Emanuel 302, p. 5, December 20, 2008). Harris
told Blagojevich Obama’s suggestion on November 12, 2008 (Blagojevich Home
Phone Call # 539).
19. President-elect Obama was also involved in other senate candidate choices. On
December 8, 2008, John Harris’ secretary’s call log noted President’s Chief of
Staff called at 10:47 am and wrote “needs to talk to you asap” (Harris 302,
February 20, 2009). President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that he had a
conversation discussing the Senate seat with Obama on December 7, 2008 in
Obama’s car. President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI “Obama expressed concern
about Senate Candidate D being appointed as Senator. [President’s Chief of
Staff] suggested they might need an expanded list to possibly include names of
African Americans that came out of the business world. [President’s Chief of
Staff] thought he suggested Senate Candidate E who was the head of the Urban
6 See, Paragraph 38, Indictment entitled “Efforts to Obtain Personal Financial Benefits for ROD BLAGOJEVICH in
Return for his Appointment of a United States Senator.” The paragraph states: “Beginning in or about October
2008, and continuing until on or about December 9, 2008 . . .”
7 See, Wisconsin ex rel. Monsoor v. Gagnan, 497 F.2d 1126 (7th Cir. 1974) (holding that the state trial court
committed reversible error and violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and compulsory
process by striking the testimony of the only corroborating witness to a phone call that related directly to the
defendant’s defense), citing Braswell v.Wainwright, 463 F.2d 1148, 1155-56 (5th Cir. 1972) (holding that “Closely
related to [the defendant’s] Sixth Amendment right is his right to a fair trial - - to due process. [The defendant] had a
right to at least present the testimony of his sole corroborating witness to the jury. That the jury might still have
returned a guilty verdict is beside the point; judgment of the credibility of witnesses is for the trier of fact.”)
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 4 of 11
5
League and with President’s Chief of Staff’s suggestion." (President’s Chief of
Staff, 302, 12-20-08).
20. President Barack Obama has direct knowledge of the Senate seat allegation.
President Obama’s testimony is relevant to three fundamental issues of that
allegation. First, President Obama contradicts the testimony of an important
government witness. Second, President Obama’s testimony is relevant to the
necessary element of intent of the defendant. Third, President Obama is the only one
who can say if emissaries were sent on his behalf, who those emissaries were, and
what, if anything, those emissaries were instructed to do on his behalf. All of these
issues are relevant and necessary for the defense of Rod Blagojevich.
21. Tony Rezko is one of the government’s main witnesses.8 Mr. Rezko’s credibility is
extremely relevant in this trial. In many instances, Mr. Rezko is the government’s
crucial witness to prove up their allegations.9 Mr. Rezko wrote a letter to a federal
judge stating “the prosecutors have been overzealous in pursuing a crime that never
happened. They are pressuring me to tell them the “wrong” things that I supposedly
know about Governor Blagojevich and Senator Obama. I have never been a party to
any wrongdoing that involved the Governor or the Senator. I will never fabricate lies
about anyone else for selfish purposes.” (Exhibit A)
22. However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s
former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys
a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the
government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated
in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by
personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official
who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of
cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies having
conversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated
in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo
offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a
fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the
8 The defense has requested that the government provide a witness list. To date, the government has not provided a
list of witnesses.
9 See, Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the Indictment. The Pension Obligation Bond Deal ( p. 9 (para. 7), p. 48 (para. 6)); The
Solicitation of Ali Ata (p. 9 (para. 9)), Benefits Given to Rod Blagojevich (Rezko directed or provided payments to
Rod Blagojevich’s wife) (p. 53 (para. 9 (a.), (b.), (c.))), Blagojevich used the power of the Office of the Governor to
give Rezko substantial influence over appointments to boards and commissions (p. 8 (para. 5)) (p. 13 (para. 18)) (p.
42 (para. 4-5)) (p. 47 (para. 4)) (p. 53 (para. 17)).
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 5 of 11
6
public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such
conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the
public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and
administration, which the public official denies having had.”10
23. President Obama is the only one who can testify as to the veracity of Mr. Rezko’s
allegations above.
24. President Obama has pertinent information as to the character of Mr. Rezko.
President Obama can testify to Mr. Rezko’s reputation for truthfulness as well as his
own opinion of Mr. Rezko’s character. See, Fed. R. Evid. 405(a) and 608. Mr.
Rezko and President Obama became friends in 1990. According to President Obama,
Mr. Rezko raised as much as $60,000 in campaign contributions for Obama.11
25. Based on the relationship that President Obama and Mr. Rezko had, President Obama
can provide important information as to Mr. Rezko’s plan, intent, opportunity, habit
and modus operandi. See, Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) and 406. For example, in June 2005,
President Obama purchased a house for $1.65 million, $300,000 below the asking
price. On the same day Tony Rezko’s wife, Rita, paid full price -- $625,000 -- for the
adjoining land. In January 2006, Obama paid Mr. Rezko $104,500 for a strip of the
adjoining land. The transaction took place when it was widely known that Mr. Rezko
was under investigation.12 President Obama’s relationship with Tony Rezko is
relevant and necessary Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) and 406 evidence.
26. Regarding a Presidential subpoena, the Supreme Court has held that:
“The right to the production of all evidence at a criminal trial . . . has
constitutional dimensions. The Sixth Amendment explicitly confers upon
10 The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama. See, “Obama on Rezko deal: It
was a mistake”, Dave McKinney, Chris Fusco, and Mark Brown, Chicago Sun Times, November 5, 2006. Senator
Barack Obama was asked: “Did Rezko or his companies ever solicit your support on any matter involving state or
federal government? Did Al Johnson, who was trying to get a casino license along with Tony Rezko, or Rezko
himself ever discuss casino matters with you?” Senator Obama answered: “No, I have never been asked to do
anything to advance his business interest. In 1999, when I was a State Senator, I opposed legislation to bring a
casino to Rosemont and allow casino gambling at docked riverboats which news reports said Al Johnson and Tony
Rezko were interested in being part of. I never discussed a casino license with either of them. I was a vocal
opponent of the legislation.” Obama’s involvement with Tony Rezko and this legislation coincides with the
three paragraph summary the government has provided to the defense referenced above.
11
“Obama on Rezko deal: It was a mistake”, Dave McKinney, Chris Fusco, and Mark Brown, Chicago Sun Times,
November 5, 2006.
12
“8 Things you need to know about Obama and Rezko”, Tim Novak, Chicago Sun Times, January 24, 2008.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 6 of 11
7
every defendant in a criminal trial the right ‘to be confronted with the
witnesses against him’ and ‘to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor.’ Moreover, the Fifth Amendment also guarantees that
no person shall be deprived of liberty without due process of law. It is the
manifest duty of the courts to vindicate those guarantees, and to accomplish
that it is essential that all relevant and admissible evidence be produced.”
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683, 711 (1974).
27. Although it is not commonplace to subpoena a sitting President, the Supreme Court
has noted that sitting Presidents have been subpoenaed by federal courts with
“sufficient frequency that such interactions between the Judicial and Executive
branches can scarcely be thought a novelty.” Clinton v. Jones, 520 US 681, 704, 137
L.Ed. 2d 945, 967 (1997).
28. Indeed, history is replete with cases in which Presidents have been subpoenaed or
have provided evidence in federal cases.13
29. In addition to criminal trials, Theodore Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John F.
Kennedy were defendants in civil cases involving actions prior to taking office.
Clinton v. Jones, 520 US at 692, citing People ex rel. Hurley v. Roosevelt, 179 N.Y.
544, 71 N.E. 1137 (1904); DeVault v. Truman, 354 Mo. 1193, 194 S.W.2d 29 (1946);
Bailey v. Kennedy, No. 757,200 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1960); Hills v. Kennedy, No. 757,201
(Cal. Super. Ct. 1960). President Nixon was deposed in several civil actions and
13 See, United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. 30 (No. 14,692d) (CC Va. 1807) (President Thomas Jefferson ordered to
comply with a subpoena duces tecum in the trial of Aaron Burr); Rotunda, Presidents and Ex-Presidents as
Witnesses: A Brief Historical Footnote, 1975 U. Ill. L. F. 1, 5-6 (referencing President Monroe’s answers to
interrogatories in the trial of an appointee, whose meetings with the President were cited as contributing factors to
accusations he received his job appointment under “intrigue and misconduct” and also references a lengthy
deposition given by President Grant in a criminal case); United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683, 41 L.Ed. 2d 1039
(1974) (The Supreme Court held that President Nixon was obligated to comply with a subpoena duces tecum in a
criminal trial); United States v. Poindexter, 732 F. Supp. 142, 145, citing to United States v. Mitchell, 385 F.Supp
1190 (D.D.C. 1974) and United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.Supp.2d 31, 80-81 (D.C. Cir. 1976) (where President
Nixon was subpoenaed by the Government and defendants in criminal trials of his appointees resulting from the
Watergate scandal); United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp. 578 (ED Cal. 1975) (where President Ford was
subpoenaed and deposed as a defense witness in the criminal trial of the woman accused of attempting to assassinate
him); United States v. Poindexter, 732 F.Supp. at 145 (D.D.C. 1990) (referring to President Carter’s videotaped
deposition in a criminal trial and a separate grand jury investigation); Id., at 144-46, 159-60 (where President
Reagan was ordered to testify via videotaped deposition in the criminal trial resulting from the Iran-Contra affair);
and Clinton v. Jones, 520 US at 705, citing United States v. McDougal, 934 F. Supp. 296 (ED Ark. 1996) and
United States v. Branscum, No. LRP-CR-96-49 (ED Ark., June 7, 1996) (referencing President Clinton’s compelled
testimony via videotaped deposition in two criminal proceedings, including as an impeachment witness for the
defense in the McDougal case).
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 7 of 11
8
Presidents Lincoln, T. Roosevelt, Tyler and Adams were compelled to appear before
congressional committees. United States v. Poindexter, 732 F. Supp at 145.
30. It is well settled that the Federal Courts have subpoena power over a sitting
President. Chief Justice Marshall’s early opinion from the Burr case has
been “unequivocally and emphatically endorsed” by the Supreme Court and
other federal courts. See, United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 706; Clinton v.
Jones, 520 US at 704.
“Whatever difference may exist with respect to the power to compel the
same obedience to the process, as if it had been directed to a private
citizen, there exists no difference with respect to the right to obtain it. ...
The guard, furnished to this high officer, to protect him from being
harassed by vexatious and unnecessary subpoenas, is to be looked for in
the conduct of a court after those subpoenas have issued; not in any
circumstance which is to precede their being issued.” United States v.
Fromme, 405 F. Supp. At 582, citing United States v. Burr, at p.30.
31. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that “the twofold aim [of criminal justice]
is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer.” United States v. Nixon, supra, citing
Berger v. United States, 295 US 78, 88 (1935). The Court continued, in Nixon, that
“the need to develop all relevant facts in the adversary system is both fundamental
and comprehensive. The ends of criminal justice would be defeated if judgments were
to be founded on a partial or speculative presentation of the facts. . . To ensure that
justice is done, it is imperative to the function of courts that compulsory process be
available for the production of evidence needed either by the prosecution or by the
defense.” United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 709. In sum,
[Federal precedent holds that] no person, even a President, is above the
law and that in appropriate judicial proceedings, documents and other
tangible evidence within the very office of the President may be obtained
for use in those judicial proceedings. Similarly, where the President
himself is a percipient witness to an alleged criminal act, the President
must be amenable to subpoena as any other person would be. United
States v. Fromme,405 F.Supp. at 582 (emphasis added).
32. Here, President Obama is a critical witness. All of President Obama’s testimony
would entail evidence he witnessed before he became president and does not involve
Executive Privilege. As the District Court ruled in Fromme:
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 8 of 11
9
“Notwithstanding the burden which is imposed on the person of the
President if he is called to testify as a witness in a criminal trial, this
court has an even heavier burden to ensure a fair and a speedy trial to
the accused, with total regard for all the rights and protections afforded
an accused under the law of this land.
‘[The] allowance of the [Executive] privilege to withhold evidence that
is demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial would cut deeply into the
guarantee of due process of law and gravely impair the basic function of
the courts.’” United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp. at 583 (emphasis
added)(citations omitted), citing United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 712.
33. President Obama has direct and intimate knowledge of facts alleged in the indictment.
Indeed, the President is a percipient witness. United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp.
at 581. President Obama is a witness to the conduct alleged as well as an
impeachment witness to at least two of the government’s critical witnesses.14
34. The defense does not take lightly the overwhelming schedule the President has and
the security constraints surrounding his testimony. A videotape deposition will
remedy both of those legitimate concerns. See, Fed. R. Crim. Pro. 15 and see also,
United States v. Fromme, 405 F.Supp. at 582 (videotape deposition “protect[s] the
accused’s rights under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution while
at the same time imposing the least onerous burden on the person and the office of the
President of the United States.”).
35. The defense requests that, if this court grants a videotape deposition in lieu of in-court
testimony, defense counsel be permitted to conduct the examination of President
Obama after the government’s case in chief. See, United States v. McDougal, 103
F.3d 651 (ED Ark. 1996) and 943 F.Supp. 296 (ED Ark. 1996) (videotaped
deposition of President Clinton which took place at the White House, and because
President Clinton was called as a defense witness to impeach David Hale, the Court
ordered that President Clinton not testify until after the in-court testimony of David
Hale.).
36. The defendant has a right to put on a case and challenge the allegations the
government attempts to prove. President Obama is relevant and necessary to the
14 Joseph Aramanda is another government witness that President Obama can testify to as well. Joseph Aramanda’s
son, John Aramanda, received an internship with then-Senator Obama. Joseph Aramanda contributed $11,500 to
Obama since 2000 and John Aramanda was recommended by Tony Rezko. Internship also links Obama, Rezko,
Frank Main, Chicago Sun-Times, December 24, 2006. President Obama will be able to provide relevant information
as to Joseph Aramanda. See, para. 24 and 25, supra.
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 9 of 11
10
defendant’s case. The defense understands that the President of the United States of
America is not a routine witness and would not request his appearance if it did not
think he was critical to the liberty of Rod Blagojevich. Whatever security or
scheduling concerns can be reduced by arranging for the most convenient
presentation of testimony. The President can testify via video conference or can be
deposed outside of court at an evidence deposition. These options would satisfy the
defendant’s fundamental right to a fair trial and security and scheduling concerns.
37. The defense requests this court grant this motion not because Rod Blagojevich was
the Governor of Illinois, but because he is a defendant in a criminal case where his
liberty and freedom are at stake. Likewise, the defense requests this court grant this
motion to issue a subpoena ad testificandum to President Obama, not because he is
the President of the United States, but rather because he is a witness necessary to Rod
Blagojevich’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. Justice requires no more and no less.
“it would be inconceivable -- in a Republic that subscribes neither to the
ancient doctrine of the divine right of kings nor to the more modern
conceit of dictators that they are not accountable to the people whom
they claim to represent or to their courts of law -- to exempt [the
President] from the duty of every citizen to give evidence that will
permit the reaching of a just outcome of this criminal prosecution.
Defendant has shown that the evidence of the . . . President is needed to
protect his right to a fair trial, and he will be given the opportunity to
secure that evidence.” United States v. Poindexter, 732 F. Supp at 159.
WHEREFORE, defendant Rod Blagojevich respectfully requests this Honorable Court
order the government turn over to the defense any and all reports generated during any and all
interviews had with President Barack Obama and issue a subpoena ad testificandum for
President Obama to appear at the trial of United States v. Rod Blagojevich.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Sam Adam
Sheldon Sorosky
Sam Adam
Michael Gillespie
Samuel E. Adam
Aaron Goldstein
Lauren Kaeseberg
6133 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
(773) 752-6950
Attorneys for Rod Blagojevich, Defendant
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 10 of 11
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that Defendant’s MOTION FOR THE COURT TO
ISSUE A TRIAL SUBPOENA TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA was served on April 22,
2010, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 49, Fed. R. Civ. P. LR 5.5, and the General Order on
Electronic Case Filing (ECF) pursuant to the district court’s system as to ECF filers.
/s/ Sam Adam
One of the attorneys for Rod Blagojevich
Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 327 Filed 04/22/10 Page 11 of 11

Blago Has the Goods On Obama, Fireworks Starting

Chicago, IL-The Regular Democratic Party Organization here is nothing more than a criminal Mob enterprise operated by the Daley-Burke Crime Families. They exist through racketeering, bribery, extortion, theft of public funds and a code of silence.

Former Governor Rod Blagojevich got sideways with his former friends and that gave the U.S. Attorney here, Patrick J. Fitzgerald rare job security through a changing Presidential administration. Fitzgerald has enough knowledge to destroy Barack Obama and is holding a trump card as J. Edgar Hoover did over everyone during his dynasty at the FBI. Wire-taping was the tool for both men.

When Blagojevich was arrested his former pals that endorsed him for the state’s highest office quickly labeled him as mentally ill and a liar before he said a word in his own defense. Blagojevich was part of the crime cabal, wheeling and dealing no differently than anyone else in that cesspool.

Now Blagojevich’s lawyers are seeking to subpoena Barack Obama. That’s not a dumb move since Blagojevich has the goods on our Socialist leader. Obama has the both the need and ability to force the case against Blagojevich to quietly end.

As for the wire-taped conversations Fitzgerald has, they are being kept secret. They can only be one reason for that and it’s called a cover-up. That’s what has been Fitzgerald’s trump card he hopes will perhaps even land him a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.

I can’t predict just what will happen other than to say Fitzgerald will do anything and everything to protect Obama. Blagojevich should simply come clean and go public with everything he knows about the former members of that Chicago criminal enterprise that included Barack Obama. The conspiracy and cover-up needs to end. Obama needs to be exposed, removed from the Whitehouse, tried and put in prison with all of his fellow mobsters.