The Short Barrel Rifle Controversy: A Fight Against Ignorance and Misguided Legislation

The politicians behind the Gun Control Act of 1934 either didnât understand firearms or deliberately ignored reason and logic. In response to Prohibition-era gang wars, they aimed to make firearms less dangerous but failed, categorizing practical tools like short-barreled rifles (SBRs) alongside machine guns and explosives. This wasn’t just overreach it was a direct attack on personal liberty and common sense.

Short-barreled rifles are essentially pistols with a shoulder stock, making them easier to handle, improving accuracy, and reducing accidents. These enhancements particularly benefit individuals with physical limitations, such as the elderly or those with arthritis. Ironically, better accuracy during Prohibition-era gang conflicts might have reduced collateral damage by minimizing harm to bystanders. Yet lawmakers chose to vilify a firearm design that could have improved safety for everyone.

Modern solutions, like pistol braces, have exposed the absurdity of the SBR ban. Acting as de facto shoulder stocks, these braces provide the same benefits. Predictably, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE) opposes this innovation is not for public safety but as a matter of control. Similarly, vertical fore-grips, which add stability and improve firearm handling, are restricted without logical justification.

These bans are particularly harmful to individuals with disabilities, who rely on such features to exercise their Second Amendment rights safely. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), denying access to these tools is discriminatory and indefensible. Modifications like pistol braces and vertical grips empower people with physical limitations to handle firearms effectively, whether for self-defense or recreational shooting.

Restricting SBRs under outdated laws not only defies logic but also creates unnecessary barriers for people with disabilities. Such restrictions conflict with the ADA’s intent, strengthening the argument for repealing these regulations. The problem isn’t short-barreled rifles or their features it’s misguided legislation and bureaucratic overreach.

How can such an evil person be elected mayor of Los Angeles?

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass stands as a glaring example of failed leadership, dangerous ideology, and catastrophic negligence, leaving the city vulnerable to death, disaster and despair.

Her troubling past includes direct involvement with ruthless Marxist organizations, notably the Venceremos Brigade in the 1970s, a group dedicated to supporting Fidel Castro’s oppressive Cuban regime. Bass repeatedly traveled to Cuba during this time, openly aligning herself with mass murderers, like Castro and Che Guevara. Supporting dictators who trample on freedom and human rights is a damning stain on her record and underscores her unfitness to lead any free society.

Where was the media during the elections, and why did they actively shield this treacherous woman’s past? Karen Bass, with her long political career, has benefited from a complicit media eager to cover up her actions and enable her destructive mission. This raises serious concerns about the media’s role as not just passive observers but active facilitators of an agenda aimed at undermining the American way of life and system of government. Their willful negligence and enabling behavior demand accountability.

Los Angeles, a city historically prone to catastrophic disasters such as earthquakes, wildfires, and riots, is crumbling under her watch. Despite the city’s immense vulnerability, Bass has knowingly made destructive decisions that have endangered public safety and left Angelenos ill-equipped to withstand crises. She cut nearly $20 million from the fire department’s already strained budget, crippling its ability to respond to the ever-worsening wildfire season. Hundreds of fire department vehicles are sitting idle because the city has failed to fund basic maintenance, and fire hydrants throughout Los Angeles are neglected and non-operational. When wildfires struck with terrifying ferocity, destroying billions of dollars in property and displacing countless families, Bass’s administration was shamefully unprepared to respond. Lives were lost, homes reduced to rubble, and irreplaceable heirlooms destroyed—all while city leadership failed its most basic responsibilities.

The devastation doesn’t end there. Bass has allowed the homeless crisis to spiral out of control, ignored the fentanyl epidemic ravaging communities, and neglected public safety, leaving Angelenos more vulnerable than ever in a city where riots and social unrest have repeatedly erupted throughout history. Instead of focusing on solutions, she has wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on pet projects that serve no real purpose.

Even in the face of such catastrophic failures, Bass refuses to take any accountability. She smiles for cameras, offering empty platitudes while Angelenos suffer the devastating consequences of her leadership. Her inaction and negligence have left the city totally unprepared to deal with the expected fire threat.  

Karen Bass’s leadership is a dangerous liability for Los Angeles. She must be investigated, held accountable, and prosecuted for her gross negligence and failure to protect the city. In a region so vulnerable to natural and human-made disasters, her recklessness has not only betrayed the people of Los Angeles but has cost lives, livelihoods, and any sense of security. She has proven herself unfit for office and unworthy of the freedoms she has failed to protect. 

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass stands as a glaring example of failed leadership, dangerous \ideology, and catastrophic negligence, leaving the city vulnerable to disaster.  

My take away from the 2025 SHOT SHOW in Las vegas.

 

Las Vegas, NV — The 2025 SHOT SHOW once again proved why it’s the premier event for firearm enthusiasts. Having attended these shows for as long as I can remember, I still find them thrilling. While the public isn’t< invited, a robust media presence—including vloggers and bloggers—ensures everyone gets a glimpse of the latest innovations, even if they can’t handle the products themselves.

Firearm enthusiasts know that the core technology of firearms hasn’t fundamentally changed in over a century. The modern case cartridge, which integrates the bullet, powder, and primer into a single unit, was invented in 1808 by Jean Samuel Pauly. His groundbreaking design laid the foundation for later advancements, such as the rimfire cartridge by Flobert in 1845 and the centerfire designs by Boxer and Berdan in the mid-19th century. The last major innovation came in 1884 when Paul Vieille introduced smokeless gunpowder, revolutionizing firearm reliability and efficiency. Since then, the focus has shifted to refining ergonomics, reliability, and aesthetics.

One of the most iconic developments in recent history is the transition from wooden stocks to lightweight synthetic materials, exemplified by the military M-16. This “black rifle,” with its controversial 5.56mm cartridge, was designed more to incapacitate than to kill, creating a logistical burden for enemy forces. Its civilian counterpart, the AR-15, has become a favorite for self-defense, particularly among the elderly and disabled. Lightweight, easy to handle, and highly accurate, it provides a level of confidence unmatched by most handguns.

Today’s firearms are not just tools; they are works of art. Manufacturers are embracing bold designs, offering firearms in vibrant colors and artistic finishes that showcase personality and flair.

The SHOT SHOW is also a reflection of broader cultural trends. Over the last 20 years of having Democrats in the Whitehouse, relentless attempts to curtail gun rights have driven unprecedented firearm sales, with an estimated 100 million additional guns sold during the Clinton, Obama and Biden administrations. Equally notable is the significant rise in gun ownership among women, who are embracing firearms as tools for defense of self and their loved ones.  

Another fascinating phenomenon during the SHOT SHOW is its effect on Las Vegas. With nearly 70,000 armed attendees in town, crime virtually disappears. Over the years, I’ve never heard of a single injury or fatality at the SHOT SHOW or NRA events—a testament to the responsibility of the firearm community.

This year’s SHOT SHOW was as massive and overwhelming as ever. With only four days to explore, it’s impossible to see everything. Strategic planning is essential to make the most of the experience.

Beyond the exhibits, the SHOT SHOW is a reunion for many in the industry. I enjoyed reconnecting with old friends and colleagues and am already looking forward to the 2026 show. For gun enthusiasts, the SHOT SHOW is more than an event—it’s a celebration of our shared passion.

President Donald Trump was elected with a clear mandate to end the illegal immigration crisis plaguing our nation. The American people spoke loud and clear: they demand an end to this invasion that threatens our sovereignty, security, and prosperity. Millions of illegal trespassers have undermined our nation’s laws, strained our resources, and compromised the safety of American citizens. President Trump must deliver on his campaign promise to restore law and order by enforcing immigration laws and removing these individuals who have no legal right to remain in our country.

Under the Biden administration, the refusal to secure our borders and enforce immigration laws amounts to a betrayal of the American people—a dereliction of duty that borders on treason. By allowing millions of illegal immigrants to flood into our country, the administration has jeopardized national security, strained public systems, and put the interests of foreign nationals above those of American citizens. This is not mere negligence; it is a willful act against the United States’ sovereignty.

Inevitably, enforcing the rule of law will lead to protests and outcries from those who prefer to break our laws rather than face the challenges of improving their own nations. If these individuals dislike the conditions in their homelands, their fight should be with their corrupt governments—not at the expense of American citizens. History teaches us that freedom and sovereignty are not achieved through appeasement but through struggle and sacrifice, often paid for in blood by patriots defending their homeland.

Our cemeteries are filled with brave Americans who gave their lives to protect this nation from the evils of fascism, communism, and socialism. We owe it to their sacrifice to protect the sovereignty of our nation from this modern-day invasion and to ensure that the United States remains a beacon of law, order, and freedom. Anything less is an insult to the sacrifices of those who came before us.

The Democrats Gave Us President Donald J. Trump (and It’s Hilarious)

Donald Trump: the man, the myth, the showman. Loved by Washington insiders, adored by the media, and a king of the entertainment world. That is, until he uttered the most terrifying words imaginable to the establishment: “I’m running for president.”

What happened next? They flipped faster than a pancake at an IHOP. Suddenly, the guy who threw the best parties and cracked the best jokes became Public Enemy #1. Why? Because they feared one thing: Trump wasn’t an insider. He was the wild card sheriff who just might shut down their gravy train of institutional corruption.

And then came the Democrats. Oh, the Democrats. Every time they tried to take him down, they accidentally made him stronger. It’s like they were Trump’s hype men, constantly reminding his supporters why they loved him in the first place. The lawsuits, the indictments, the breathless media meltdowns—each one was like handing Trump a free ticket to the top of the polls. Talk about reverse psychology!

But let’s get to the real comedy gold. The Democrats unintentionally boosted Trump into icon status with their over-the-top antics. McDonald’s French fries? Trump turned that into a populist culinary statement. Manning a garbage truck? That’s blue-collar charisma right there. And eulogizing Little Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon? Only Trump could turn roadkill into a rallying cry for unity.

Then there’s Barron Trump. The kid became the Gen Z whisperer, turning TikTok into TrumpTok. Meanwhile, Donald himself—hardly a spring chicken—embraced the memes, learned the tech, and proved that even a man of his age can outmaneuver “Word Salad Lady” without breaking a sweat.

Now, with four more years of Trump ahead, it’s not just Republicans cheering. It’s anyone who wants health, wealth, security, and a chance to watch America’s greatest showman do what he does best: Make America Great Again—again.

So thank you, Democrats. You really outdid yourselves this time.

Will the Political Left Succeed in Assassinating Donald Trump?

The battle for America’s soul has reached a fever pitch. Tomorrow, the socialist cabal entrenched in the White House faces the reckoning they have long dreaded. The self-proclaimed champions of “progress” have torched, shredded, and erased every incriminating document they could get their hands on—desperately trying to conceal the evidence of their corruption. Meanwhile, countless new boxes of top-secret files are undoubtedly now stashed in Joe Biden’s garage, a fitting symbol of his disdain for accountability.

But the threat to Donald Trump—and by extension, the Republic—goes far beyond bureaucratic sabotage. There exists a fanatical and unhinged contingent of Trump-haters who are so consumed by their hatred that they would stop at nothing, including murder, to silence him. It wasn’t enough for them to orchestrate the 2020 coup d’état through blatant voter fraud. Now, their obsession with eliminating Trump has taken a more sinister and dangerous turn.

Trump has already survived two bona fide assassination attempts, and there’s no doubt the attempts will continue. The Secret Service must remain not only vigilant but absolutely unwavering in their loyalty. Yet, history shows us the grim reality: most attempts on a president’s life have ended in tragedy—either death or grievous injury. The frightening possibility of heavy weapons like bombs, mortars being deployed against Trump looms over this volatile chapter in American history.

The stakes have never been higher. The next four years could bring a renaissance of constitutional fidelity and national strength.  America has a Constitution, and it cannot be rewritten with fraud, betrayal, or violence. Our system demands lawful amendments, not disloyal politicians, bullets, and bombs.

As for tomorrow, the words of Kamala Harris hang in the air with dark irony: “We will become unbound by what has been.” But the question remains—unbound from socialism or a free Republic?

The political left and women’s rights

 

Ah, the political left—champions of drama and masters of fear-mongering! They’d have you believe that conservatives are lurking behind every corner, ready to snatch away women’s rights and slap a second-class citizen badge on them. Next thing you know, they’ll claim conservatives want women in bonnets, churning butter, and attending compulsory etiquette classes.

Let’s get one thing straight: I don’t endorse total abortion bans. I’m not about to hold a “ban everything” rally. But hey, can we agree on some boundaries here? If you’re going to make that decision, maybe consider doing it earlier rather than treating it like a last-minute Amazon return.

This isn’t about rights—it’s about unrestricted, no-holds-barred abortion access. The Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade didn’t just overstep; they took a running leap off the constitutional cliff. Apparently, they found a magical “right” hidden between the lines of the Constitution—maybe in invisible ink? Last I checked, “abortion” and “reproductive rights” were about as common in the Constitution as UFO landings.

Let’s talk about a real threat to democracy. Roe v. Wade bypassed the American people completely. No vote, no discussion—just nine unelected judges deciding for 330 million people. But democracy works better when states decide for themselves, right? You know, that whole “government closer to the people” idea. Crazy concept.

Now, the abortion zealots don’t stop at claiming women are losing a right—they insist women are losing every right. Calm down, Chicken Little. The sky isn’t falling. As propaganda master Joseph Goebbels said, repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it. And boy, has the left taken that advice to heart.

Let’s face it, abortion hasn’t disappeared in America—it’s alive and well, especially in states where leftists are busy screeching the loudest. If you live in a Bible Belt state and just can’t resist the urge to “terminate,” pack a bag and book a budget flight to a liberal state. Spirit Airlines can get you there for the price of an Uber ride. Just don’t forget the snacks—they charge for everything else.

TikTok is Officially Toast: A Celebration of Vertical Video’s Demise

Wfell, folks, it finally happened—TikTok is offline, and I, for one, couldn’t be happier. TikTok was a platform that brought us cringe-inducing dances, questionable life hacks, and the soul-sucking horror of vertical videos. Seriously, who decided that filming through a keyhole was the way to go? I get it, everyone’s glued to their phones, but have we forgotten that screens can turn sideways? It’s not hard, people.

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the drama behind TikTok’s shutdown. The official story is that we were worried about the Chinese government using it to spy on us. Because apparently, seeing Becky from Iowa lip-sync to Taylor Swift is a matter of national security. But really, why would the Chinese bother with TikTok when they could probably just hit up Hunter Biden for a discount on classified intel? The guy’s got a laptop full of goodies, after all. Throw in Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, and you’ve got a discount espionage dream team. Who needs TikTok when your politicians are basically handing out state secrets like IHalloween candy?

And let’s not forget, TikTok didn’t just ruin video aesthetics—it ruined lives. People have literally died trying to one-up each other with daredevil stunts for likes. Darwin Awards, meet your new sponsor. But sure, TikTok was the real threat to America, not the NSA logging every phone call, text, and late-night Google search you’ve ever made. Nope, it’s the dancing teens we should be afraid of.

In reality, the Patriot Act and other government snoop-fests are far scarier than a platform that’s 90% cats and people falling off treadmills. But hey, at least now I don’t have to endure another poorly filmed vertical cooking tutorial. That, my friends, is the real victory.

My favorite actress may surprise people

Carice van Houten is, without a doubt, my favorite actress. She first captured my admiration in the electrifying Dutch film Black Book,directed by the legendary Paul Verhoeven. It’s a cinematic masterpiece that showcased the full spectrum of her talent—acting, singing, and even dancing. And yes, she looked absolutely stunning throughout, including in her daring nude scenes, which were integral to the story.

Life after 2006 wasn’t all glitz and glamour for Carice. Fame brought its challenges, including dealing with stalkers and the complexities of her personal life. During Black Book, sparks flew between her and co-star Sebastian Koch. Their romance was passionate but short-lived, as the distance between her home in Amsterdam and his in Berlin proved too much. Secretly, I hoped I might have a chance to step in—but alas, that wasn’t meant to be. Instead, Carice found love with Australian actor Guy Pearce. While they keep a low profile, they share a son, Monty. She used to share glimpses of him on social media (carefully protecting his identity), but even those updates have stopped, likely out of security concerns.

Now approaching 50, Carice stands at a crossroads where many actresses face an uncertain future. But I believe she still has plenty of magic left to offer.  She’s going to begin production shortly on a UK film.  While I never cared much for her role in Game of Thrones,her depth and versatility as an actress have never wavered. In a perfect world, I’d cast her in a million films. She’s long dreamed of playing Greta Garbo, and I hope she gets that chance before time runs out.

Carice isn’t just a brilliant actress; she’s also a gifted singer. Her album See You on the Ice, co-produced by my friend Ken Stringfellow, is a beautiful testament to her musical talent. And let’s not forget her haunting rendition of “100 Years From Today” on the Black Book soundtrack. She also made memorable appearances in films like Race, where she portrayed Hitler’s cinematographer, Lini Riefenstahl and Valkyrie, as Tom Cruise’s onscreen wife.

Carice is a rare gem—a true talent who has managed to stay grounded despite the chaos of fame. While her career seems quieter these days, I’m holding out hope for a big comeback. She deserves to shine on screen again, and I’ll be cheering her on every step of the way.

Update:  I have some very sad news and that is that Carice and her husband Guy Pearce have decided to split the sheets.  In many ways that not so surprising considering that their entertainment careers go in two different directions and that requires them to be a part a great deal of the time.  As we know that is not good for any marriage, but the question is about their little boy Monty.  I know he’s gonna have a tough time being only with one parent at a time, and hopefully both parents will go out of their way to share love and custody for this little guy.

There is however good to be, and that is I have a chance to get next to Carice! However, the chances of that are far less than me winning the Powerball lottery twice in a row.

In any event, I wish Carice the very best. She’s got a long life ahead of her and lots of exciting films that I hope to see her in soon. .  

A Flashlight Could Save Your Life

 

The night was suffocatingly dark in Paradise Valley, Arizona in October of 1987—a town shrouded in quiet and lit only by the stars above. There were no streetlights, no safety in visibility, just shadows stretching endlessly into the void. I was there as a process server, having just served an eviction notice to a woman.  What I didn’t know was that the shadows would soon hide a predator—and my fight for survival.

I was making my way back to my car when her husband, seething with rage, emerged from the darkness. Without warning, he struck me with the heavy steel of a Colt 1911 .45. The force sent me reeling, blood streaming into my left eye. Disoriented and half-blinded, I staggered, but his intentions were clear. The cold, merciless muzzle of his gun found me, and I saw death in his eyes.

Instinct roared to life. My hand reached for my own weapon, a modest five-shot .38. In the chaos, I managed to fire—not once, but five times. Each shot tore through the darkness and into his body. My attacker stood motionless, and I was left standing, bloodied and shaking, in the unrelenting black. I chose to flee rather than try to reload.

But what if things had been different? What if I had carried a flashlight powerful enough to turn the night into day, to shatter his advantage and blind him before he ever struck?

The flashlight I had that night was old technology, useless, its batteries spent—a mere deadweight in my pocket. Had I been armed with a high-powered light, perhaps I could have disarmed him with blinding brilliance, avoiding the bloodshed that still stains my memory.

Not long after, I discovered a groundbreaking tool: the SureFire 6 P flashlight. The SureFire 6P flashlight was first introduced in 1988.  This model marked a significant advancement in flashlight technology, combining the benefits of lithium batteries with a high-power xenon bulb, setting a new standard for compact, high-efficiency flashlights.  The bad news was this flashlight was not yet available for me. It did not come out until months later. Small enough to slip into your pocket yet powerful enough to pierce the deepest shadows, it was the tool I needed that night but didn’t have.  As soon as the 6P model hit the street it became a must have item for me.  

A few years later I  showed mine to Massad Ayoob, the legendary firearms expert, when he wrote about my incident. He immediately saw its value, picked up the same 6P model, and has carried it ever since—though I’m certain he now uses an upgraded version.

Today, SureFire not only makes incredible handheld lights but weapon-mounted ones as well. These tools don’t just illuminate—they dominate. The power to obliterate an attacker’s vision, to seize control of the encounter before it begins, is nothing short of life-saving.  I’d go visit their website and pick out what suits your needs. 

In the darkest moments, a powerful flashlight isn’t just a tool—it’s the difference between survival and tragedy. Never step into the shadows without one.