Let me predict that the Supreme Court’s ultimate gunfight is set to restore the Second Amendment.   The United States Supreme Court has a habit of saving its biggest constitutional thunderclaps for the end of term—and this year is no exception. Two high-stakes Second Amendment battles—Snope v. Garland and Ocean State Tactical v. Rhode Island—are locked in at SCOTUS, and the justices are not letting them go quietly. Rather than issuing a routine denial or grant of certiorari, the Court has relisted these cases again and again in conference—an unmistakable signal to seasoned court watchers that the justices are circling something explosive. This pattern strongly suggests that the Court may be preparing to grant certiorari and use these cases to reaffirm and perhaps expand on the principles it laid down in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___ (2022). In Bruen, the Court made it abundantly clear: the Second Amendment is not a second-class right. Any l...

The 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___ (2022) , delivered a seismic blow to the anti-gun agenda, striking down an estimated 20,000 federal, state, and local gun laws that blatantly violated the Second Amendment. This landmark ruling reaffirmed an undeniable truth: the Second Amendment means what it says and says what it means—the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Yet, in open defiance of the Constitution and the Supreme Court, blue states have launched a full-scale rebellion. They’ve flooded the courts with resistance and doubled down by enacting even more unconstitutional gun laws. Let there be no doubt: the Bruen decision is a line in the sand, a call to restore the fundamental freedoms enshrined in our Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment is not negotiable.

Bundy Ranch, Nevada —About 80 miles Northeast of Las Vegas the scene was a cattle ranch and the sprawling rangeland around it.   On one side were BLM Rangers with battle gear and dogs.  Men and women trying to convince the rangers to leave them, the cattle and the ranch in peace occupied the other side.  Tensions were high as the rangers threatened to shoot the civilians. Because the area is rural sources for water, prepared meals, ammunition was greatly limited.  The two sides had gathered ready for a very violent conflict. . The Barack Obama worshiping network media did not want the nation seeing the heavy hand of their Messiah crushing a longtime cattle rancher and his supporters.  That would damage the carefully crafted image they created for him.  They will always avoid humiliating Obama at all cost.   However Social Media and some news organizations covered the resistance movement really well. Because of Social Media, thousa...

Protesters across from The George Brown Convention Center in Houston Texas Houston, TX —The National Rifle Association just held their Annual Meeting here.  Membership of the NRA tops five million.  This meeting hosted a record crowd of over 86,000 folks that came in from all 50 states.   The economy of Houston was boosted along with public safety.  You see most of the NRA members came armed with lawful loaded and concealed weapons.  As for that 90% claim there were about two-dozen determined demonstrators that can be seen above.  I guess it’s time to wonder where these 90% are hiding.  The answer is abundantly clear that 90% figure is the product of an Obama wet dream . I was hanging out for a while with none other than Glen Beck at the Eagle Grips booth  who seemed to like Mother of Pearl and Ivory grips for some of his personal firearms. Glen Beck visiting with Paul Huebl   

Washington, DC —Prohibition brought about unprecedented violence in the United States as criminals fought over the lucrative alcohol trade.  By 1934 Prohibition was over but the memories Chicago's  St. Valentine’s Day Massacre and numerous other crimes were fresh in our politicians memories.  They passed the nation’s first federal gun control law. Prior to The National Firearms Act of 1934 Americans could buy most military small arms and explosive devices at their local hardware store or by the convenience of the US Postal Service!   Machineguns, hand grenades, Bazookas and silencers could be purchased and no questions were asked.  The new gun law was not a ban on these weapons but a stiff $200.00 tax on each regulated item.   Taxing rights soon became unconstitutional when the Supreme Court later outlawed Poll Taxes because they discriminated against poor people.   That tax has never been raised because they simply know that the tax won’t...

Blogger Paul Huebl with a S&W model 29 .44 Magnum revolver.   Washington, DC —Creating lists of law-abiding Americans with firearms has no benefits whatsoever.  Guns are almost never left at crime scenes and when they are learning the legal owners identity is usually meaningless because the offender is either captured or killed. There are two U.S. Supreme Court cases that make it clear that persons precluded by law from owning firearms cannot be forced to register their guns or face prosecution when they don’t.  Registration violates their rights against self-incrimination. We all saw the recent fallout from the names and personal information being published by a Leftist newspaper trying to somehow shame gun owners.  That list also told every thug, rapist and killer where to find unarmed and helpless victims.  Proponents of registration schemes claim that gun registration is harmless and no different than drivers and automobile licensing....

Clark County, WI —Last June, Joshua D. Schultz , of Sauk City was arrested for carrying a concealed weapon. Since this state had no provision for permits exactly like Illinois this absolute ban violates the right to keep and bear arms. The defense made a simple Motion to Dismiss and Judge Jon M. Counsell ruled the law violated the Constitution. Schultz was freed. Now Schultz can go to the U.S. District Court and sue police for the violation of his Civil Rights under USC 1983. Like it or not Heller and McDonald is the law of the land. State and local governments may be able to require permits if they are freely issued to law-abiding citizens. The existing blanket prohibitions against concealed weapons cannot stand. Here is the ruling: Schultz CCW