Donald Trump Should Order Immediate Pardons for Three Heroes

It’s time for Donald Trump if elected to act decisively and grant immediate, full pardons to Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Chelsea Manning. These individuals are not criminals; they are heroes who risked everything to expose the deep-rooted corruption and abuses of the American government—revelations that all Americans have the right to know.

Assange, an Australian journalist, simply exercised his right to publish the truth through WikiLeaks, standing firmly on First Amendment principles. His only “crime” was revealing to the world what the U.S. government wanted to hide. Snowden, a government contractor, blew the whistle on the NSA’s sweeping, illegal mass surveillance of American citizens, exposing how our own government was secretly intercepting and storing our private phone calls and Internet communications. Manning, a United States Army soldier, courageously followed her conscience, providing Assange with key evidence of government misconduct and upholding the spirit of the Nuremberg principles by refusing to stay silent about illegal actions.

For Manning, the consequences were severe: prosecuted in a general court-martial, dishonorably discharged, and twice imprisoned. But in following her conscience, Manning refused to obey illegal orders and did the only right thing by ensuring that the American people were not deceived by their own government. This was no different from Daniel Ellsberg’s courageous release of the Pentagon Papers, which exposed lies about the Vietnam War.

As a society that claims to value truth, transparency, and justice, we must recognize Assange, Snowden, and Manning for what they truly are—heroes who sacrificed their freedom to defend ours. They deserve comprehensive and immediate pardons. Manning should also receive full back pay, veterans benefits, and a reclassified honorable discharge.

While the Democrats have shown no interest in doing what’s right, Donald Trump must make these pardons a priority as our 47th President. Assange, Snowden, and Manning have paid enough for exposing the truth. Now, it’s time to recognize their bravery and honor their contributions to justice and freedom.

Working from Home: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Working from home has drastically shifted the landscape for both employers and employees, offering new benefits but also revealing some complex challenges.

The Financial Impact on Businesses

Commercial real estate, office furniture, and employee parking are costly expenses for businesses. For companies that had to maintain large office spaces, these costs piled up quickly. However, with the shift to remote work, businesses no longer need extensive office space, reducing their expenses on rent, utilities, and cleaning crews. This has offered substantial savings, particularly in the post-COVID era, where companies have embraced virtual solutions to reduce overhead.

COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of technology, allowing for effective remote communication and collaboration. Video conferencing tools like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack enable teams to hold meetings and manage projects without needing physical office space. This shift has benefited many office-based roles but has limitations for industries reliant on physical presence, such as manufacturing and service sectors.

The Convenience for Employees

For employees, remote work eliminates commuting, saving hours of daily travel time and reducing transportation costs. For parents, the savings extend to daycare, allowing more flexibility in balancing work and family life. Furthermore, the need to dress formally for work has lessened, and employees can work comfortably in their own space, often in pajamas or loungewear.

Remote work also led to some unplanned, humorous moments, like children interrupting Zoom calls, pets vying for attention, or even spouses accidentally joining meetings. These moments have added a human touch to the workplace, breaking down barriers and adding levity. But it also reminds us that our “office” is now wherever life happens—a reality that sometimes leads to unintended consequences, as seen in high-profile missteps like that of CNN legal commentator Jeffrey Toobin, who famously forgot to turn off his camera and inadvertently exposed himself masturbating during a call, offering a cautionary tale on the importance of camera awareness.

Enhanced Productivity and Technology

As technology continues to advance, remote work setups have become more efficient. File sharing, project management tools, and cloud storage solutions streamline workflows and make it easier for teams to remain productive outside of a traditional office. The flexibility allows employees to customize their work environment, which can lead to higher productivity for self-motivated individuals.

The Downside of Remote Work

While remote work has clear advantages, it’s not without its downsides. One significant drawback is the loss of spontaneous collaboration. Physical offices allow employees to communicate, brainstorm, and troubleshoot problems in real time, which often sparks new ideas and strengthens teamwork. Without face-to-face interaction, employees may feel isolated and disconnected from their colleagues.

Distractions at home can also impact productivity. From household chores to family obligations, the home environment isn’t always conducive to focused work. For those who live alone, the lack of social interaction can lead to feelings of loneliness or depression, which could negatively affect their motivation and mental health.

Another issue is that remote work may make it difficult for employees to separate their work and personal lives. The boundaries between “work hours” and “personal time” can become blurred, leading to burnout. Some people may find themselves constantly on call, responding to emails and messages outside traditional working hours.

The Future: Hybrid Models

Many companies are adopting a hybrid approach, encouraging employees to come into the office a few days a week to maintain team cohesion while allowing remote work on other days. This hybrid model could provide a balance between the benefits of remote work and the collaborative advantages of office environments.

Conclusion

Working from home has opened new doors in flexibility and cost savings, but it’s a complex arrangement with both positives and negatives. As technology continues to evolve, it will likely improve the remote work experience further, but businesses and employees must find ways to address the social and psychological impacts.

Whether it’s children hilariously interrupting Zoom calls or the occasional reminder to stay vigilant on camera, remote work is a dynamic, ever-evolving reality that has changed the way we view “the office” forever.

America is on the brink of massive civil unrest.

The United States is home to more than 18 million veterans, most of whom are seasoned and experienced, even if age has slowed some of us down us down. We may no longer sprint into battle, but our knowledge and skill with firearms remain intact. The government trained us well to combat communists and we are keenly aware of our responsibility to disobey any illegal orders issued by officials. History, notably the Nuremberg trials, has taught us that “just following orders” is never a valid excuse for participating in atrocities.

Veterans understand what is right, and most of us are deeply committed patriots. The political Left dislikes us precisely because we take our oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution seriously. We are prepared to vigorously oppose any attempt to undermine or suspend our constitutional rights, including the imposition of martial law. Many veterans have sons and daughters currently serving in the military, who would recognize threats to our freedoms and respond accordingly, even if that means turning their guns on officials who prioritize their own agendas over the American people.

Leftist politicians seem oblivious to these truths as they push relentlessly to dismantle America’s foundations, hoping to rebuild it in a Marxist image. We stand now at a pivotal juncture, with the upcoming election representing a boiling point for our country.

Regardless of the election outcome, a peaceful resolution seems increasingly unlikely. The deep divisions within our nation have reached a fever pitch. Military leadership appears compromised, with generals who have advanced by currying favor with figures like Biden, Harris, Obama, and Clinton. Their loyalty, tragically, seems directed more toward personal gain than toward serving the nation.

With our precious Second Amendment and over 400 million firearms in civilian hands, tyranny will find no easy foothold in America. But the question looms: how high a price, in lives lost, must we pay to defend our freedoms?

Conservatives and veterans alike have prepared for the possibility of a worst-case scenario. We pray that those on the Left realize their dreams of a communist utopia have no place in this nation. If such ideals are what they desire, perhaps they should seek them elsewhere.

Prepare for Election Day Chaos: Protect Your Business and Family

This Tuesday, we’re facing the most divisive elections of our lifetimes, and with it, a surge of violence likely funded by sources like Soros. In every major city, expect opportunistic criminals to wreak havoc—arson, looting, and worse. These individuals don’t care about politics; they’re just looking for an excuse to destroy and loot.

Expect Strategic Sabotage: Just like before, you may see pallets of bricks mysteriously appearing on main streets—not for construction but for chaos. These aren’t coincidences; they’re intended for ANTIFA and BLM thugs to use as weapons, escalating destruction as soon as the polls close, especially if early results favor Donald Trump.

Protect Your Livelihood: If you own a business, shut it down on Tuesday night and stay closed on Wednesday. Remove cash and valuable merchandise from your premises. In high-risk areas, board up now. If calm returns by Thursday, you can breathe easier, but until then, your property is a target.

Prepare for Potential Shortages: If violence is prolonged, expect delivery trucks to be grounded. Essential items, from food to medicine, may run out fast. Stock up now on necessities.

Defend Against Arson: Arson is the greatest threat. Check that all fire extinguishers are functional and accessible. Be ready to act as your own first responder; in a worst-case scenario, police and fire departments may not be able to respond.

Consider getting out of town if you can—safely away from the potential unrest. And above all, ensure your insurance is up to date. Let’s hope these precautions are unnecessary, but history tells us that preparation now is crucial. Stay vigilant, stay safe, and be ready.

State v. Wilson: The Battle Over Public Carry Rights Reaches the Supreme Court

The Second Amendment debate has taken a new turn, and all eyes are now on the U.S. Supreme Court as it considers whether to take on State v. Wilson, a case with the potential to reshape the landscape of gun rights in America. At the heart of the issue is Hawaii’s stringent requirement for permits to carry firearms in public. State v. Wilson poses a significant question: does a state’s licensing requirement infringe upon the Second Amendment right to bear arms? With a scheduled conference on November 1, 2024, this case could mark a major shift—not by expanding gun rights, but by restoring them to the people, where they rightfully belong.

The background of State v. Wilson is rooted in Hawaii’s restrictive stance on public firearm carry, requiring residents to obtain a permit to carry guns outside their homes. The state justifies these measures as essential for public safety, given its unique cultural and legal history. However, opponents argue that these restrictions are unconstitutional, especially in light of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. In Bruen, the Court ruled that gun regulations must be consistent with historical norms and cannot impose undue barriers on the right to bear arms. Many view Hawaii’s permit requirements as a direct contradiction to this precedent.

The impact of a potential Supreme Court ruling in favor of Wilson could extend far beyond Hawaii. Should the Court decide to hear the case and ultimately side with Wilson, it would reinforce a broader trend toward “constitutional carry”—the right to carry a firearm without a permit. Currently, over half of U.S. states have adopted some form of constitutional carry, signaling a movement toward a more permissive approach to public carry rights. A ruling in Wilson’s favor could limit states’ ability to impose restrictive licensing laws, moving the nation closer to a uniform standard that aligns with the Second Amendment as traditionally understood.

If the Supreme Court grants certiorari, this case could set a national precedent by affirming that the right to bear arms in public is indeed fundamental and not subject to restrictive state licensing schemes. For states with strict gun control measures, a decision favoring Wilson could necessitate a reassessment of their laws and bring about a nationwide shift towards constitutional carry.

As the Supreme Court prepares to discuss State v. Wilson on November 1, gun rights advocates and state governments alike are paying close attention. This case stands as a critical test of the balance between state authority and individual rights under the Constitution. While some view the potential outcome as an expansion of gun rights, others see it as a return of these rights to the people—a restoration of freedoms that have long been safeguarded by the Second Amendment.

The Menendez Brothers: A Different Perspective

Beverly Hills, CA—Eric and Lyle Menendez were born into a family deeply entrenched in the entertainment industry. Their father, Jose Menendez, was a successful entertainment executive, having held prominent positions at RCA Records and later as the president of LIVE Entertainment (also known as International Video Entertainment), a major company in film production and distribution. His influence helped shape the entertainment landscape during the 1980s, making the Menendez family a powerful name in Hollywood.

It’s fair to assume that other relatives of the Menendez brothers remain influential in the entertainment industry. This family network could have the reach and resources to greenlight projects that reshape public perception, making the creation and promotion of films about these two infamous brothers a strategic move. With the case already high-profile, leveraging such media influence today to cast them in a sympathetic light isn’t far-fetched. As a result, it seems the Menendez brothers may be on the fast track toward parole before the holidays.

In this context, it’s hard to ignore the role wealth and privilege play in shaping justice. While 35 years behind bars is significant, many other offenders typically begin to reenter society after serving 20 years or more. For the Menendez brothers, serving three decades was a long sentence, but the power of their family’s influence appears to be changing their fate.

Let’s be clear: our criminal justice system is many things, but fair isn’t always one of them. In this case, wealth and influence played a major role, highlighting the disparity between those who have resources and those who do not. The Menendez brothers have the advantage of both, a luxury most serving life sentences without parole can only dream of.

Comparing MAGA with National Socialism is criminal defamation.

New York, NY —Kamala Harris and her allies on the radical left have sunk to new lows, slandering Donald Trump and his supporters by branding them as Nazis. They shamelessly insinuate that Trump’s campaign rally at Madison Square Garden is akin to the 1939 pro-Nazi event held there. This vile comparison crosses every conceivable boundary.

These political agitators, propped up by their willing accomplices in the media, have weaponized lies and crossed into outright criminal behavior with their defamatory rhetoric.

Their objective is clear: to tarnish the image of MAGA and cast it in a negative light. Yet MAGA stands for nothing but the noble goal of restoring America’s greatness. At the rally, an immense and truly diverse crowd came together—Americans of every race, religion, and background. Their shared vision? A country of greater freedom, reduced taxes, peace instead of endless wars, and neighborhoods free from crime and decay. There is absolutely no parallel between Trump supporters, who seek a better future for all, and the twisted followers of Adolf Hitler. This heinous smear campaign by Harris and her cohorts is a baseless attack on millions of patriotic Americans.

Such extremist, inflammatory rhetoric endangers lives, fueling the minds of those who could be pushed to violence. It’s recklessly irresponsible on every level. Rather than present solutions for inflation, security, or prosperity, these desperate politicians fall back on hatred and division. Their messages reek of unbridled animosity, devoid of any semblance of constructive vision.

You heard it from me there is no question. The Democrats want to see Donald Trump murdered.

The Harris/Walz campaign has crossed into dangerous territory, igniting the flames of violent extremism and openly embracing assassination as a political strategy. Lacking any legitimate platform or vision, they have abandoned reasoned discourse, replacing it with a relentless campaign of hate, vilification, and outright incitement against President Trump. This is not about policy; it’s about destruction, division, and control at any cost. They cynically label Trump as a “fascist,” “Nazi,” and “dictator,” echoing the chilling words of Joseph Goebbels: “If you tell a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.” They seem intent on turning lies into weapons, hoping that their incendiary language will incite violence.

Already, there have been two attempts on Trump’s life, and the dangerous rhetoric from the Democrats suggests they believe that “the third time’s the charm.” Their words are a loaded weapon aimed directly at the heart of our Republic. This is not merely irresponsible; it is a calculated and deliberate threat to the democratic fabric of our nation. The true danger here is not Trump but the unhinged rhetoric from those who would risk our country’s stability for the sake of power. 

Groping allegations as the last Hail Mary in a political race.

  

Let’s Talk About “Grope”: A Hands-On Guide to the World’s Most Awkward Word (Especially When Running for political Office)

Welcome to the world of grope, a word with more layers than an overstuffed burrito. Today, I’m here to help you unpack all the ways we (awkwardly) stumble into situations where this term is oddly accurate. Let’s dive in, definition style, and embrace the art of grope— the innocent, the mental, and the definitely illegal.

Ah, the classic move: the courting grope. In the history of humanity’s clumsiest flirtations, this maneuver has somehow survived every social evolution.

Men, with their fearless approach to “testing the waters,” might see a grope as the ultimate dare in the courting process — a bold attempt to break the touch barrier, sometimes without realizing that barriers exist for a reason. Women, on the other hand, are generally not hardwired for such tactics. Instead, they’ve mastered subtleties like eye contact, laughter, and even conversation. But some men? They go straight for the grope, figuring it’s the fast track to a connection, only to find it’s more like the express lane to a swift exit. The simple truth of the matter is that none of us would be here unless our fathers started the party with a grope.

Ah, yes, the infamous courting grope: a romantic gesture as old as time, performed almost exclusively by men who have somehow confused boldness with just… bad decision-making. Picture it — somewhere in the male mind, a little voice says, “This is it! She’ll find it charming!” And so, with the bravery of a knight charging into battle (but less armor and more cologne), he goes for it.

Women, meanwhile, have this thing called tact. They’ll play the eye contact game, they’ll laugh a little too long at jokes, they’ll even toss out a casual arm touch — anything to show interest without making it weird. But some men? They skip these subtle maneuvers and head straight for the grope, as if it’s a shortcut to love rather than the express lane to a restraining order.

It’s as if they think the courtship game is just one step: Step one, grope; step two… happily ever after? Meanwhile, women everywhere are left to wonder: Was that a… signal? Or do you just not understand personal space? It’s a mystery as old as the hills — and just as likely to leave everyone involved groaning.

Isn’t it interesting that all of the women who have complained that Donald Trump groped them are Democrats?  That must be a real coincidence.

Film Review: “September 5” - A Gripping Journey Back to Munich, 1972

Los Angeles, CA—One of the perks of being a Screen Actors Guild member is exclusive access to film screenings. This time, it was at the stunning theater at Paramount Studios, where not only did I see the film, but I got to meet the talented cast and the young visionary Swiss director, Tim Fehlbaum.

“September 5” transports viewers back to the Munich Olympics of 1972—a global celebration of athleticism that quickly spiraled into a nightmare. The world watched in shock as Palestinian terrorists, under the name Black September, launched a calculated attack, kidnapping and brutally murdering 11 Israeli athletes and coaches, along with a German policeman. Helping orchestrate the horror were infamous German radicals Andreas Baader and Ulrike Meinhof, making the tragedy even more chilling.

What sets this film apart is its unique perspective: we experience the horror through the eyes of ABC News sports reporters and producers, who were on-site in Munich, covering the Olympics. Imagine using the “cutting-edge” equipment of 1972—now laughably outdated by today’s standards—to broadcast a massive international story. The pressure was relentless; these were sports reporters suddenly plunged into a global crisis well beyond their usual scope. Yet, through their determined reporting, they became the eyes and ears of the world.  Nearly 1,000,000,000 viewers watch this unfold worldwide on live television. 

Sean Penn produced this film, and regardless of personal opinions on his politics, there’s no denying his extraordinary talent. The acting is powerful, the cinematography innovative, and the experience immersive. Watching, you feel as though you’re right there in the cramped, chaotic makeshift studio alongside the reporters, experiencing every tense moment as they grapple with a breaking tragedy.

As the story unfolds, you already know that history won’t deliver a happy ending. Yet, the intensity never lets up. This is a film like nothing you’ve ever seen before. “September 5” will keep you on the edge of your seat, captivated by the courage, humanity, and tragedy of that day in Munich. Don’t miss it.

The film opens in select theaters November 29.  It opens nationwide on December 13.  

Charged with a Serious Crime? You Need a Public Relations Crisis Management Expert

Los Angeles, CA— We’ve seen time and again how a media-created narrative can have a decisive impact on a jury’s verdict. If the media sows doubt, you have a chance. If they condemn you, you’re likely finished.

But wait! Jurors are instructed to avoid media coverage, right? In reality, judicial admonishments are often ignored, and jurors regularly turn to Google to dig up information. The percentage of jurors violating these rules is alarmingly close to 100%.

Some defense attorneys seek media attention not necessarily to help their clients but to elevate their own careers. Take the Scott Peterson case, for example. What could have been a routine murder trial in Modesto, California, turned into an international sensation, largely because Peterson’s defense lawyer courted publicity.

Scott Peterson wasn’t convicted by the evidence alone but by the loud commentary of media personalities like Nancy Grace. Grace capitalized on Peterson’s deceptive behavior and infidelity to paint him as a villain, influencing the jury’s perception. Even now, no medical expert can definitively state how Laci Peterson died. There’s no certainty that she wasn’t a victim of something other than murder.

Recently, we’ve witnessed a shift in the narrative surrounding the Menendez Brothers, influenced by a couple of documentaries and a new wave of media coverage.

The case of Ohio osteopath Sam Sheppard was one of the first where media manipulation played a significant role. Sheppard was crucified in the press, swaying the public and jury to see him as a murderer despite shaky evidence. Years later, a German woman who became romantically involved with Sheppard mounted a media campaign proclaiming his innocence, attracting the help of famed attorney F. Lee Bailey. The resulting shift in media narrative ultimately helped secure Sheppard’s freedom.

These examples show the incredible power the media holds in shaping public opinion and controlling the thoughts of their audience. Many of us like to believe we’re immune to this kind of influence, but that’s far from true. The media doesn’t always tell the truth, and when they don’t, we are at risk of being manipulated.

That’s why totalitarian regimes, whether communist or fascist, always prioritize seizing control of the media. It’s the first step in their systematic brainwashing of the population.

Our legal system needs to recognize its responsibility to shield the accused from the media’s overwhelming influence. Juries should be sequestered more often, and change of venue requests should be granted more liberally. While these measures are expensive, they are less costly than the price we pay for wrongful convictions.

At 1:30 PM Pacific Time today, Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón is expected to announce his intention to release the Menendez Brothers. Facing a tough reelection fight, this appears to be his final Hail Mary to satisfy both the public and the media. Time will tell if I’m right.