The Future of Courtrooms: Embrace Zoom for Efficiency and Accessibility

In today’s fast-paced world, commuting to courtrooms for limited hearings or traffic cases is becoming increasingly impractical. It’s time to fully embrace the technology that we know works—Zoom. The COVID-19 pandemic taught us that much of the court’s business can be conducted remotely. Now, we need to take this lesson and expand its application.

Court appearances for matters like small claims and traffic citations often require litigants to travel long distances, navigate congested city streets, find parking, and waste an entire day for what might amount to a 10-minute appearance. This is not only inefficient but costly for both the individual and the system as a whole. Why are we still adhering to these outdated, resource-draining practices when technology offers a better solution?

Today, we have the capability to hold entire trials via Zoom, involving prosecutors, defense attorneys, defendants, and judges. While defendants retain the constitutional right to face their accusers, this would only be necessary in a small minority of cases. For routine traffic citations, where the police officer is often the only government witness, remote hearings make perfect sense.

The benefits of Zoom hearings are clear. First, they would reduce traffic congestion, taking numerous cars off the streets and saving energy. Second, the pressure on court security would be reduced with fewer people entering courthouse buildings, making them safer and more manageable. Finally, many courthouses are located near expensive parking facilities, further burdening individuals who are already fighting fines or legal disputes. Moving these appearances online would cut down on those extra, often predatory, costs.

Beyond convenience, using Zoom enhances government efficiency. It cuts down on unnecessary delays, makes the legal process more accessible, and saves both time and taxpayer money. For minor legal issues that need not require in-person appearances, it’s the smart, modern solution.

The legal system should be adaptive, not stuck in the past. Embracing Zoom for court proceedings is not just practical—it’s the future of good government.

The Menendez Brothers: A Tragic Story of Wealth, Abuse, and Consequences.

The Menendez brothers’ case has long fascinated the public, raising complex questions about abuse, wealth, and justice. Lyle and Erik Menendez were convicted of the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, José and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion. Their defense? Years of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse at the hands of their father, with their mother complicit through her silence and neglect. While this abuse, if true, paints a harrowing picture of their childhood, I believe it does not justify the violent path they chose.

The Menendez brothers were both adults at the time of the murders—Lyle was 21, and Erik was 18. As adults, they had the means and opportunity to escape their allegedly abusive environment. In fact, they were more than capable of fleeing from their situation rather than resorting to violence. They had access to considerable financial resources, cars, and the ability to travel freely. If life with their parents was truly unbearable, they could have left. They could have sought legal protection or, at the very least, distanced themselves from the toxic environment.

However, they chose not to. Instead, they stayed, enjoying the benefits of their parents’ vast wealth and luxurious lifestyle. Their desire to maintain that life is clear. The murders were followed by a spree of extravagant spending—sports cars, watches, and even a new business venture. It’s hard not to see this as more than just a reaction to years of trauma. It feels more like a deliberate attempt to continue living in comfort without the burden of control from their parents. They wanted the wealth but none of the abuse.

I am not suggesting that the abuse didn’t play a role in shaping the brothers’ mindset. Abuse can have devastating psychological effects that last a lifetime. But the decision to murder their parents was not the only option available to them. At some point, their actions became more about preserving their lifestyle than simply escaping the trauma of their upbringing.

That brings us to their sentencing: life without parole. Is that a fair punishment? Personally, I think life without the possibility of parole was a bit over the top. While they deserved severe consequences for their actions, I believe life with the possibility of parole would have been a more appropriate outcome. It would allow for the potential of rehabilitation and reflection, particularly given the mitigating factor of their abusive upbringing.

Justice must always strike a balance. In the case of the Menendez brothers, while they committed a heinous act, the complexity of their situation should have been given more weight. Life with the possibility of parole would have allowed the legal system to reassess their future at a later time, after years of consideration and rehabilitation.

The Menendez case is a tragic example of how wealth, power, and abuse can intertwine to produce devastating outcomes. The brothers made a terrible choice, one that cost them their freedom and their future. But the question remains: was their punishment truly just? I say, put them up for parole.  I know they are not entitled to any of their parents wealth at this stage. 

Appendix carry for striker-fired pistols is insane!

Throughout my life, I’ve tried every possible  way to carry handguns, seeking a balance of accessibility, convenience, comfort, concealment, and, most importantly, safety. It can be a very challenging goal, especially when it comes to larger firearms.

When Glock popularized reliable striker-fired pistols, many manufacturers followed suit. These pistols, however, lack the traditional manual safety lever. Instead, they have a small trigger safety that must be depressed to fire the weapon.

Now, imagine pulling your gun in a high-stress situation. Recall the female Secret Service agent fumbling for her gun during the first attempt on Donald Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania. If she had accidentally discharged the firearm, the risk of injury would have been minimal with a hip holster. Had she been using an appendix carry position, the consequences could have been much more serious.

Our bodies aren’t uniform. While some men might handle appendix carry without issue, the reality is that many have a bit of a belly, which makes safe appendix carry even more difficult. This method becomes particularly risky when reholstering under stress, such as after a physical altercation or while apprehending a criminal.

I strongly advocate for sticking to traditional hip or shoulder holsters. Appendix carry poses significant risks—self-inflicted injuries, including self-castration or severing the femoral artery, are real possibilities.

Most appendix carry holsters are cheap Kydex scabbards. If you’re looking for a holster, choose carefully from established manufacturers. Your life depends on it, so price should never be a concern. Personally, I’ve trusted Galco holsters for over 50 years. While they do offer some well-designed appendix models, their shoulder and hip holsters are the safest bet, providing protection without endangering the family jewels.  

Donald Trump says it all right here. It is time to end the reign of terror brought to you by Kamala Harris!

 

SHOT SHOW 2025: A Must-Attend Event for Firearms and Outdoor Enthusiasts

The SHOT Show (Shooting, Hunting, and Outdoor Trade Show) returns in 2025, once again drawing professionals from around the globe to the largest event of its kind. From January 21-24, 2025, Las Vegas will host this annual expo that has become a cornerstone of the firearms, ammunition, and outdoor gear industries.  If you are not an industry professional, beware that the public is not invited to this event.  

What to Expect at SHOT Show 2025

As the world’s premier event for the shooting sports industry, SHOT Show 2025 promises to be even bigger and better than previous years. The event will feature over 2,500 exhibitors, offering the latest in firearms, ammunition, tactical equipment, and outdoor accessories. Attendees will have access to new product showcases, hands-on demonstrations, and the opportunity to connect with industry leaders.

Why You Can’t Miss SHOT Show 2025

Even with that missing tech push, SHOT Show 2025 will still be the place to be for professionals in the shooting, hunting, and law enforcement industries. Whether you’re a dealer, distributor, or manufacturer, the networking and educational opportunities are unparalleled. Attendees will have the chance to sit in on seminars, witness the latest tactical gear, and possibly get an early glimpse of prototypes or other emerging trends.

Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of the action, explore the latest innovations, and engage with the leaders shaping the future of firearms and outdoor equipment.

Register Now for SHOT Show 2025

Reforming America’s Prisons: A Path to Humane and Effective Solutions

America’s prison system has become counterproductive, excessively expensive, and unnecessarily violent.

There is a major issue with public perception of prisons. Many believe prison is solely for punishment, leading to indifference about the suffering of inmates. Our so-called correctional system is often seen as the lowest priority in law enforcement.

Can prisons be reformed? Absolutely, and it doesn’t need to cost nearly as much as we are currently spending.

First, let’s address prison violence. The individuals sent to prison are often some of the most violent people in our society, coming from various troubled backgrounds. Multiculturalism in prisons only exacerbates tensions, leading to beatings, rapes, and even murders. Segregating inmates by cultural or ethnic groups may not be a politically correct solution, but it would significantly reduce these violent conflicts. Doing so would make managing inmates easier, lower medical expenses for treating injured prisoners, and reduce workers’ compensation and disability payments resulting from staff injuries. This practical approach would make a difference in creating safer environments.

A significant portion of crime in America is fueled by narcotics addiction. The criminalization of drugs has led to vastly inflated prices, resulting in wealth for drug dealers, corruption among public officials, and a variety of related violent crimes. Drugs are not expensive to produce, but their illegal status makes them costly. Ending the drug enforcement policies that enable these black markets could put dealers out of business overnight. For those struggling with addiction, we should focus on providing meaningful treatment options—not as a way to avoid jail but to support those genuinely seeking freedom from addiction. Current programs almost always function as mere “get out of jail free” cards for people with no real intention of breaking their habits.

Another major issue is the lack of productive activities in prison. Inmates often have idle time, which contributes to further criminal behavior. These individuals will eventually re-enter society, and we have a choice: they can either become productive citizens or hardened criminals. Most prisoners receive little more than occasional vocational training, which does little to prepare them for life after release.

Everyone desires meaningful work that pays well and makes a difference, and inmates are no different. Many have talents that go unnoticed and undeveloped. The entertainment industry—whether as actors, singers, or comedians—does not require background checks. Yet few prisons cultivate these talents. Many inmates may possess great singing voices or comedic abilities, but they’ve never had the opportunity to explore them. Helping inmates develop their potential in these areas could open doors to a successful future.

Similarly, many renowned chefs began honing their culinary skills while incarcerated. The culinary arts are another field where background checks are less of an obstacle, and many former inmates have successfully opened their own restaurants. This is a true measure of rehabilitation and success.

Additionally, many inmates lead lives that are far from ordinary, which gives them a unique perspective. Some have turned this experience into a talent for writing. Who knows how many potential Ernest Hemingways are behind bars, waiting to be discovered?

In any event, the last person we ask about what training they would like to get is the inmate.  They may have their own great ideas that we should not ignore.

Technology has brought us a Zoom and Skype calls.  Prison inmates should be allowed liberal access so that they can communicate to loved ones and mentors.  Right now the correctional telephone systems are nothing less than a corruption cabal and accordingly their families pay exorbitant and prohibitive amounts of money on those calls.

Respect is key to transforming prison culture. Inmates are rarely addressed with the basic dignity of being called “Mr.” or “Ms.” A foundation of mutual respect between staff and inmates—starting with proper greetings—could help foster empathy and kindness. Many inmates never experienced the positive influences of good parenting. Teaching respect, tolerance, and kindness in prisons would be one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce violence.

Only after inmates learn these core values of respect and empathy can multiculturalism be considered. In the meantime, segregating inmates to reduce violence is a necessary first step.

Stopping The Surge of Violent Mob Robberies at 7/11 Stores in California

Los Angeles, CA— California has seen a disturbing rise in violent “takeover” robberies at 7/11 stores, where groups of young thugs are using brute force and intimidation to commit their crimes.

Despite the clear and present danger to employees and customers, the 7/11 corporation maintains a policy prohibiting its workers from carrying firearms. However, this policy is far from practical. Some employees will naturally prioritize their own lives and safety over a corporate directive, especially when faced with violent criminals.

California law is unequivocal: these victimized store clerks are legally permitted to use deadly force to protect themselves during these heinous acts. It is only a matter of time before an employee takes action, using a firearm to defend against these foolish and reckless mobsters. While corporate policy may dictate one thing, it is the California Penal Code that ultimately prevails, making it clear that individuals have the right to protect themselves,with deadly force especially when facing a threatening group whose sheer numbers make them as dangerous as any armed assailant.

These brazen young offenders are playing a dangerous game. Their chaotic, violent robberies may soon meet a much harsher reality, as they push the limits of what people will tolerate. They may soon find out the hard way that their violent crimes will have severe, possibly deadly, consequences.   Maybe that’s what it’ll take to slow these horrific robberies down.  

This is October 7 and I am mad as Hell

It is October 7, and I am absolutely furious. I hold the Israeli government just as responsible as the Hamas terrorists for the horrific massacre and kidnappings that unfolded. There is no doubt that the Israeli government actively enabled and facilitated these terrorists in carrying out their monstrous acts.

Israeli politicians made the catastrophic decision to disarm their own people, enforcing the same kind of gun bans that have rendered law-abiding citizens defenseless in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York. The insanity of this policy is laid bare when you consider that Israel is a tiny nation surrounded by hostile forces—a culture driven by radical Islamist ideology committed to the murder of anyone outside their faith. This barbaric attack was not just foreseeable; it was inevitable. Innocent men, women, and children were left utterly defenseless, stripped of any means to protect their lives.

These politicians who betrayed their own people by disarming them have committed nothing short of treason. Their actions are unforgivable, and there is no justification, no excuse, for stripping Israeli citizens of their God-given right to defend themselves. This is a betrayal of the highest order, and they must be held accountable for this despicable failure.

They don’t want you to know the real power you hold as a juror.

When you receive a jury summons, whether it’s for federal or state court, the basic rules are similar. You may be selected for either a grand jury or a petit jury.

A grand jury typically consists of at least 23 members and some alternates. Unlike a trial jury, they hear multiple cases but don’t determine guilt or innocence. Their role is to decide if there’s enough evidence (probable cause) to require a defendant to stand trial. Grand jury proceedings are always held in secrecy.

A prosecutor leads the grand jury, guiding them through the process and ultimately telling the jury what they want in terms of an indictment. The foreman of the jury signs the indictment if the jury agrees.  The grand jury need not be unanimous in returning their verdicts.  

You’ll never see a defense attorney in a grand jury room because they’re not allowed. Defendants are usually invited to testify, though defense lawyers nearly always advise against it. On rare occasions, a defendant may choose to testify, but this often harms their case.

The prosecutor explains which criminal laws apply and presents a narrative for why they seek an indictment. They usually call witnesses, often police officers, to testify about what happened. Unlike in a trial, hearsay is allowed, and there’s no defense attorney to object to leading questions from the prosecutor.

Soon, the prosecutor asks the grand jury to vote on whether to issue an indictment (a “true bill”). If they decide there’s not enough evidence, they return a “no bill.”

Here’s what the grand jury isn’t told: they have immense power. They can demand that real witnesses or evidence items be brought in and questioned directly. Prosecutors hate when this happens because it disrupts their control over the process.

Prosecutors prefer jurors who are compliant. But remember, when you’re on a grand jury, it’s your power, not the prosecutor’s. Don’t be afraid to use it.

Now let’s talk about the petit or trial jury, the one most people are familiar with from movies or news. After both sides present their case and make closing arguments, the jury is given instructions. Then comes the deliberation.

Here’s where your true power as a juror comes into play: jury nullification. This means you can decide that the law being applied is unjust or unreasonable. You don’t have to follow the instructions exactly, and no one can punish you for this decision.

Jurors are often told not to consider the potential penalties of their verdict. When they speculate, they’re usually wrong. I believe juries should be informed about the consequences, but they never are. In some cases, juries are given options, like choosing between a murder or manslaughter conviction. These compromises can lead to verdicts that don’t always reflect justice, though they’re sometimes appropriate only if the defendant is truly guilty of a lesser offense.

As a juror, your verdict is yours alone. Don’t let others pressure you into changing your mind. If the jury can’t agree unanimously, a mistrial is declared, and the prosecutor can choose to retry the case or offer a more attractive plea deal to the accused. 

After a guilty verdict, there’s still a brief window for jurors that voted Guilty to change their minds. The defense lawyer will often ask for the jury to be polled, and I’ve seen two cases where a juror has said “no” when asked if it was truly their verdict. In such cases, a mistrial is required.

That’s the reality of jury duty. Don’t be afraid to exercise your power—it’s an essential part of the justice system.

Our Despicable Democrat Leadership Punishing Hurricane Victims!

Three vile traitors are withholding life-saving aid from the hurricane victims in an unforgivable display of political spite. There is no doubt that the millions of illegal aliens these tyrants brought into our nation are being treated far better than the Americans devastated by this disaster. The path of this deadly storm cut directly through Republican strongholds, and instead of a swift federal response, the government imposed a no-fly zone, deliberately blocking civilian helicopters from rescuing stranded survivors.

FEMA’s pathetic attempt at relief — a one-time payment of $750 — is a disgrace, especially when compared to the far more generous handouts given to every illegal alien the moment they set foot on U.S. soil. Countless lives were lost due to FEMA’s deliberate negligence. Let’s be clear: this was a calculated move to punish Trump supporters and suppress their ability to vote in the upcoming election.

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Alejandro Mayorkas deserve eternal damnation for their role in this monstrous betrayal of American citizens. 

Concealed Carry Permit Wait Time:

Several states, all governed by Democrat administrations, have demonstrated clear resistance to the United States Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen.  The extended delays in processing concealed carry permit applications, often lasting several months, appear to be a calculated strategy designed to undermine citizens' Second Amendment rights. The pattern of delay tactics across these states suggests a coordinated effort, which is unlikely to be coincidental. Furthermore, these jurisdictions have imposed excessive fees on concealed carry permits and continuously devise additional bureaucratic hurdles, reflecting a deliberate effort to enforce their unconstitutional disarmament policies.

It is evident that the concealed carry permit process in these states serves more to disarm law-abiding Americans than to reflect any principles aligned with the Second Amendment. In response, civil disobedience becomes the only means to confront these unjust restrictions. Citizens should stand firm in asserting their right to bear arms, challenging these obstructions in court, where the constitutionality of these actions can be tested. The Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches should shield law-abiding individuals from invasive scrutiny, while the Second Amendment guarantees their right to defend themselves and their loved ones, despite the fascist policies of certain state governments.  I say don’t bother with the permits in these states, simply take your gun and carry it and if you need it, use it.  

Artificial Intelligence and Your Future

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been around for some time, but many have regarded it as a technology of the future. However, the future is now. If you're not engaging with AI, experimenting with it, or leveraging its transformative capabilities, you risk being left behind.

Two professions that are particularly vulnerable to the rise of AI are radiologists and lawyers. Radiologists, among the highest-paid medical specialists, interpret images from x-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds to make critical diagnoses. AI has the potential to analyze these images more accurately and efficiently than even the best radiologists.

Similarly, AI is set to disrupt the legal field. With the advent of personal computers, lawyers began drafting their own documents, reducing the need for support staff. Now, AI can perform legal research and write briefs with a level of precision that rivals top attorneys, potentially making the need for extensive legal support even less critical.

AI has applications across nearly every industry. Understanding and utilizing AI will determine your employability in an increasingly tech-driven world. The rapid pace of technological advancement means that adapting to AI is no longer optional.

Politicians are becoming increasingly concerned about AI’s potential misuse, which could be weaponized in ways that threaten them. In response, they are drafting extensive legislation in an attempt to regulate something that may ultimately be uncontrollable.

AI platforms are proliferating at an unprecedented rate. Understanding how to navigate and utilize these tools is becoming as essential as basic literacy. Embrace AI now, or risk being left behind in a rapidly evolving world.