Los Angeles, CA—As a cop and private eye with a career that spans 40 years I’ve seen more trials first hand than most lawyers. I never went to law school but have learned a
lot in the, Monkey See Monkey Do School of Law.
Along the way police academies
and in loads of seminars filled in a lot of information blanks. I have worked with lawyers from the woefully
inept to the very gifted and greatest.
Many lawyers have built great reputations along with their
egos over decades of success.
Unfortunately many of the old warhorses have not embraced computer
technology or the incredible power of the Internet and Social Media. Instead they delegate any computer assisted litigation
efforts to secretaries and law clerks.
That’s a huge and sometimes deadly mistake.
For most lawyers exploring the uncharted area of Social
Media seems simple enough but actually making contributions to the mix present frightening
tactical gambles along with new and unknown ethical issues.
We’ve watched high profile trials that were Social Media
nightmares like Jodi Arias and that of Casey Anthony. As I write this article the verdict from the
George Zimmerman trial is ready to actually explode across America.
All criminal cases begin with some event involving a loss,
injury or death. The event itself may
not be a crime but rather an accident or the result of a justifiable use of
force. The police have the
responsibility to investigate. That
investigation’s results may be brought by prosecutors before a criminal jury to
decide if it’s a crime and the guilt or innocence of the accused.
In the very beginning swift action to get helpful facts out
in a high profile case may stop a misguided effort to indict a
client/suspect. If the defense can get
solid information out to the Social Media before cops and prosecutors have made
their charging decisions that effort may well stop a wrongful prosecution in it’s
tracks by making it politically unpopular.
Nothing prevents defense investigators from soliciting the
public for defense witnesses and information relevant to a client’s case using
Social Media. Additionally nothing
prevents the posting of the criminal record, immigration status and other
derogatory information about the prosecutor’s so called “victim” or witnesses
assuming libel laws are not broken.
Much of this kind of information is withheld from juries by
the courts but trust me jurors never miss opportunities to break the rules as
they use and abuse the Google search engine!
If helpful and timely material is dumped on the Social Media
in a way that reveals new and unknown information the regular press will
suddenly be all over it like a cheap suit.
Today cops, prosecutor, judges and news reporters often
scour the Internet to find information on person’s of interest or
suspects. If you move fast enough
helpful and self-serving information can be posted for these decision makers to
consider. The defense must exploit
every effort to make prosecution of their suspect/client politically
unpopular!
Of course in the George Zimmerman case, it was
self-aggrandizing provocateurs such as Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton that
created a nefarious Social Media storm. Their efforts even involved the
Whitehouse and the nation’s Attorney General.
That abuse of Social Media caused a routine self-defense/justifiable
homicide to be transformed into a wrongful murder prosecution.
The Zimmerman prosecution was brought for purely political
purposes rather than tangible evidence.
In fact, one prosecutor has already been indicted for presenting false
information to the court in her zeal to please the powerful provocateurs.
There are now two fronts in the War for Justice, the Court
of Social Media and the Court of Law. If
you can win in the Social Media Court that may entirely end the controversy.
As a defense investigator I now must use the Social Media at
every step of each case along with other computer assisted investigation
efforts. I also have this blog where I
cover high profile criminal cases. I
quickly learned the incredible influence my postings have on prosecutors, judges and even jurors! Jurors are not
supposed to research their cases but I have seen first hand that the vast majority
of jurors can’t wait to break the rules!
I have a web counter on my blog that allows me to see the
ISP, approximate location, computer and browser type of my visitors. I
routinely see the ISP of prosecutors, courts and police agencies looking at my stories
that are under their review! I won’t
publicly expose just how I learned that jurors do this but I do have solid
evidence.
When it comes to jury selection Social Media has changed
that task dramatically and forever. It’s
often incredibly easy now to learn the views of potential jurors. Any defense attorney in his right mind would
exclude those demented followers of media trial advocates like HLN’s Nancy
Grace. However many posters routinely
use fake screen names so additional efforts must be made to weed out those
trolls.
The way to investigate and handle criminal defense case has
changed forever. Lawyers need to embrace
the technology or retire.
Needless to say I’m available to race with my video gear
anywhere I’m needed.
I will leave you with two examples of Social Media YouTube
postings I created that influenced the direction of the case of man involved in
a justifiable homicide. My client was
arrested and held on a half-million dollar bond for some six days. The Grand Jury refused to indict him. Of course it helped that my client was
actually innocent. A trial murder trial
would have taken my clients assets and destroyed him even if a jury acquitted
him.
Both of the stories below were followed up by similar
stories by the most of the local
media! Would they have bothered is they
had not seen these two? Did this material help the case that never saw a courtroom?
