Whore’s Court Chicago: A Tits-and-Giggles Retrospective

 

Chicago, Illinois—Let’s take a trip back to the 1970s, a time when disco ruled, platform shoes were serious business, and the eighth floor of the old Chicago Police Headquarters at 1121 S. State St. played host to Women’s Court. Officially known as Branch 40, this bustling hub of legal hijinks was where misdemeanors involving women—aka “the fairer sex”—were sorted out. Think of it as Judge Judy meets “The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas,” with a side of CTA train noise for ambiance. Let me admit that there was never a woman judge presiding in this court. It was always a man.

Back then, women committing crimes was a growing trend. Sure, they were still the minority in police blotters, but the ones who did get caught weren’t just there for shoplifting or jaywalking. Nope, the main offenses were the old standbys: soliciting prostitution, public obscenity, and the rather poetic-sounding “loitering prostitute.” For the uninitiated, “loitering prostitute” was a catchall for any lady of the night hanging around an area known for, well, nights like that. The punishment? Usually a quick trip to court, where the judge would toss the case faster than a pimp could adjust his feathered hat.

Now, let’s talk about the real stars of this courtroom drama: the bailiffs. One was a character affectionately nicknamed Dolly, because—wait for it—she had enormous tits and a hairdo so big it needed its own zip code. Dolly Parton would’ve been proud. Her partner-in-order-keeping was Sam, a no-nonsense black woman who balanced Dolly’s over-the-top energy with steely professionalism. Together, they paraded the loitering ladies to the bench one by one, creating a spectacle that was equal parts tragic and hilarious.

And oh, the loitering ladies. Picture a lineup of black women who looked like they’d lost a fight with life and their hair weaves. They weren’t exactly the city’s crème de la crème, but they had spirit. Most even danced their way to the judge’s bench, making a final, defiant stand for dignity. One unforgettable character was Starey Washington, whose name alone could have been a headliner on a Vegas marquee.

But why were these women so eager to get arrested? Simple. It was a retirement plan, prostitute-style. By getting picked up, their cash would be inventoried by the cops, safe from the grasping hands of their pimps. Bonus: they’d score a bologna sandwich and a cup of coffee in lockup. Prostitution may not pay well for these hookers, but jailhouse hospitality had its perks.

Of course, not every working girl played it straight—or rather, crooked. Enter Mailbox Mary, a legend in her own right. Armed with self-addressed, stamped envelopes, Mary had a genius system: she’d mail her earnings to herself, ensuring her cash stayed safe from her pimp’s sticky fingers. Mary was also famous for flashing her tits at passing police cars, getting nothing in return but a few laughs and maybe a polite wave. You’ve got to respect a woman with a strategy and a sense of humor.

Outside the courtroom, the hallway was a catwalk for 1970s pimp fashion. Picture angry black men in platform shoes, fur-collared coats, and hats so ridiculous even a circus clown would’ve said, “Too much.” The pimps’ colorful outfits only added to the carnival-like atmosphere of the court, where public defenders in bad suits and toupees tried to do their best with cases that no one really cared about.

Then there were the upscale call girls—always white, always free on bail, and never setting foot in lockup. These ladies had slick lawyers like the legendary Dean Wolfson, who could make their problems vanish faster than a magician’s rabbit. Occasionally, a frightened young newbie would find herself caught in the mix, but a helpful social worker would usually guide her back to safety before the court could devour her innocence.

And let’s not forget the setting itself. With no air conditioning, the courtroom became a sauna in the summer, forcing the baliffs to throw open the windows. This meant proceedings often screeched to a halt as CTA trains thundered by, adding a soundtrack of screeching metal to the circus below.

Today, Branch 40 is a shadow of its former self. The loitering prostitute law has been declared unconstitutional, and 1121 S. State St. has been turned into a condo building. But back in the 1970s, Women’s Court was a spectacle of tits, trains, and human absurdity. They don’t make justice like they used to—and maybe that’s for the best.

Saul Alinsky: The Mastermind Behind America’s March Toward Communist Control.

If you’ve ever questioned how radical left-wing figures like Barack Obama, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and Bernie Sanders sharpened their political weapons, look no further than rules for Radicals. This infamous manifesto, penned by Alinsky himself, serves as the ultimate guide for dismantling traditional American values. It openly labels dissenters as “the enemy,” a chilling insight into the mindset driving today’s Democrat leadership.

Alinsky’s blueprint leaves no tactic unexplored, from inciting political violence to relentless, subtle indoctrination, all with the aim of reshaping America into a Marxist stronghold. Don’t take my word for it—grab a copy on Amazon and see the evidence for yourself.

Saul Alinsky (1909–1972) was a Chicago-born, “Community Organizer“  and political theorist whose work focused on empowering impressionable fools to fight for social and political change. After studying criminology at the University of Chicago, he became deeply involved in labor organizing during the Great Depression. His methods, blending pragmatism, activism and violence made him a dangerous figure in grassroots organizing.  Throughout the 1950s and 60s the University of Chicago was a hot bed of Communist activities.  

Rules for Radicals Overview:

Published in 1971, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals serves as a guide for Marxists seeking to challenge entrenched power structures and force change. The book outlines strategies to inspire mob action and disrupt systems of authority. Alinsky emphasized the importance of using existing structures and tactics creatively to empower his recruits.

The 13 Rules for Radicals:

1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

• Perception of power is often more influential than actual power.

2. Never go outside the experience of your people.

• Stick to tactics your group is comfortable with to maintain morale.

3. Whenever possible, go outside the experience of the enemy.

• Create confusion, fear, or discomfort in your opposition.

4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.

• Exploit their principles to create contradictions and expose hypocrisy.

5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

• Humor and mockery can disarm opponents and energize supporters.

6. A good tactic is one your people enjoy.

• Engagement increases when the process is fun and rewarding.

7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.

• Keep momentum by changing strategies when interest wanes.

8. Keep the pressure on.

• Maintain constant action to keep the opposition off-balance.

9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

• Fear of what might happen is a powerful motivator.

10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

• Ensure actions are sustained and impactful.

11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.

• Turning challenges into opportunities can shift the narrative.

12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.

• Offer solutions to avoid being dismissed as merely destructive.

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

• Focus on a single opponent to create a clear enemy for your cause.

Alinsky’s goals remain obvious, to destroy the American way of life by  grassroots organizing, while reimagining this nation in a true Marxist model. Regardless, Rules for Radicals has left a lasting impact on extremist Left Wing political activism and organizing strategies.

Is biological terrorism behind our contaminated food supply?

In 1984, members of the Rajneesh movement carried out a bioterror attack in The Dalles, Oregon, to influence a local election. They contaminated salad bars in several restaurants with Salmonella bacteria, sickening 751 people and hospitalizing 45. They achieved their evil goal and suppressed voter turnout gaining control of local political offices. This remains the largest bio-terror attack in U.S. history. 

Is it a just a coincidence that organic baby carrots are suddenly contaminated with E. coli bacteria?  How about the contamination of  McDonald’s onions?  

According to the CDC, these incidents are up over 47% over the year previous!  COVID-19 came just in time to disrupt the 2020 election, and now this attack. Just during the past year alone, several other significant incidents of bacterial contamination in food have been reported:

1. Boar’s Head Deli Meats (2024): In the summer of 2024, a listeriosis outbreak linked to Boar’s Head’s processing plant in Jarratt, Virginia, resulted in ten deaths and 59 hospitalizations. The outbreak led to a recall of over 7 million pounds of meat and cheese products. Investigations revealed numerous sanitation issues at the plant, including mold, insects, and condensation in post-cooking areas.

2. Berkeley Springs Bottled Water (2023): In September 2023, the FDA recalled over 150,000 bottles of Berkeley Springs Water due to coliform bacteria contamination. The affected products were distributed in West Virginia, Maryland, and Virginia. Coliform bacteria indicate potential contamination by other pathogens, though the recall was classified as Class III, suggesting the contaminated water was not likely to cause adverse health effects.

3. Gills Onions (2023): By October 2023, Gills Onions in California recalled several lots of its chopped, packaged onions after a Salmonella outbreak resulted in 80 illnesses, 18 hospitalizations, and one death. The FDA traced the contamination back to the company’s products, finding Salmonella in the water and environment of the supplying farm.

4. Frugals Milkshakes (2023): In August 2023, three people died and six were hospitalized after consuming milkshakes contaminated with Listeria bacteria from a Frugals burger restaurant in Washington state.

5. Nestlé’s Perrier Water (2024): In April 2024, Nestlé Waters destroyed two million bottles of Perrier after detecting fecal bacteria contamination in one of its wells in Vergèze, France. The contamination was attributed to heavy rains from Storm Monica in March.

6. Marmaris Kebab House (2023): In February 2023, over 50 customers of Marmaris Kebab House in Abergavenny, Wales, suffered from food poisoning caused by Shigella contamination. One affected individual continued to experience severe illness 16 months after consuming a contaminated kebab.  

Each succeeding election in America becomes more and more volatile. With two separate assassination attempts against President-elect DonaldTrump it strikes me as more than just a coincidence that we as a nation are currently under attack.

Donald Trump was elected with a strong focus on his primary campaign promise: deporting illegal aliens and securing the southern border.

Donald Trump has assured the nation that this extensive initiative will begin on January 21, 2025. Now is the time for illegal aliens to leave the United States voluntarily to avoid the risk of being forcibly removed later. Choosing self-deportation not only spares them from being handcuffed and jailed but also simplifies their opportunity to return to America legally in the future.

No one who has been forcibly deported will be allowed to re-enter the United States. It is essential to communicate this message in the native languages of illegal immigrants so they can fully understand the benefits of self-deportation.

Forced deportations will be a harsh and difficult process. Families who self-deport can remain together, while those who resist could face prolonged detention—sometimes lasting days or even weeks—while awaiting transport. Voluntary departure is the proper,  humane and practical option.

For those who meet the criteria, joining the U.S. Armed Forces offers a clear path to citizenship. Aliens (non-citizens) can gain U.S. citizenship through military service under specific conditions. Here’s an overview of the process:

1. Eligibility to Enlist as an Alien

• Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs): Green Card holders can enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.

• Non-Immigrant Visa Holders or Undocumented Immigrants: Generally cannot enlist, although exceptions exist through special programs (e.g., MAVNI program, when available, for certain visa holders with critical skills).

2. Citizenship Through Military Service

• Expedited Naturalization Process:

• Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) §§ 328 and 329, non-citizens who serve honorably in the U.S. military can apply for expedited naturalization.

• Key benefits include waivers for continuous residence and physical presence requirements.

• Service Requirements:

• During Peacetime (§ 328):

• Minimum one year of honorable service.

• Apply for citizenship while serving or within six months of an honorable discharge.

• During Periods of Hostilities (§ 329):

• Any honorable service (even one day) qualifies.

• The U.S. has been in a designated period of hostilities since September 11, 2001.

• Moral Character Requirements:

• Must demonstrate good moral character.

• Dishonorable discharge or certain criminal convictions can disqualify candidates.

3. Application Process

• File Form N-400 (Application for Naturalization) with a certified form of military service (Form N-426).

• The process is often expedited compared to civilian applicants.

4. Posthumous Citizenship

• If an alien dies as a result of active duty service, they can be granted posthumous citizenship, which may provide immigration benefits to surviving family members.

5. Benefits for Family Members

• Immediate relatives of service members (spouses, children) may also be eligible for expedited or special immigration benefits.

Are Gun Dealers Truly Pro-Second Amendment? It Depends on Their Location

Los Angeles, CA — California is ground zero for oppressive and unconstitutional gun laws that flagrantly violate the Second Amendment. In this state, the constitutional right to bear arms is practically non-existent, buried under layers of government overreach. However, the tide is turning. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), has affirmed that the Second Amendment means what it says—and that it cannot be endlessly “balanced” against vague claims of public safety. The future will see most of California’s draconian gun laws wiped from the books.

Gun Dealers Before and After the 1968 Gun Control Act

Before the Gun Control Act of 1968, firearms were sold like any other lawful product. No special licenses were required, no federal purchase forms, and no waiting periods. You could buy a firearm in person, by mail, or from a neighbor without jumping through bureaucratic hoops. So long as the seller had no reason to believe the firearm would be used in a crime, transactions were straightforward and respected personal freedoms.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 changed everything. Federal licensing requirements for dealers created layers of red tape, forcing small businesses to absorb steep compliance costs. Dealers had to operate out of brick-and-mortar locations and hire clerical staff to manage mountains of paperwork. Background checks through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) added even more administrative burdens. All of this drove up the cost of firearms for consumers—and cemented the dealer’s role as a gatekeeper.

Gun Dealers in Restrictive States: Profiting from Your Rights

In states like California, where lawmakers weaponize bureaucracy to strangle the Second Amendment, gun dealers have become, intentionally or not, arms of the government. These restrictive laws mandate that even private transactions—whether a gift, loan, or sale to a friend—must go through a licensed dealer. This means buyers and sellers must pay the dealer for what should be a private transaction.

Even worse, gun laws in these states are often written to maximize profits for dealers. Mandatory training courses, often required for gun ownership, conveniently funnel gun owners into classes run by the same dealers selling the firearms. This creates a perverse financial incentive for some gun dealers to embrace and even lobby for stricter laws.

Gun Dealers in Free States: Respecting the Second Amendment

In contrast, gun dealers in free states operate without the burden of government overreach. There, private individuals can gift, loan, or sell firearms without dealer interference. Gun dealers are not coerced into acting as agents of the state and are free to focus on selling firearms rather than enforcing unconstitutional regulations.

The Reality: Gun Dealers Need to Pick a Side

As gun control laws face growing legal challenges across the country, the role of gun dealers is at a crossroads. Dealers in restrictive states have become complicit in policies that trample individual freedoms while padding their bottom lines. But the Bruendecision makes it clear: gun rights are not negotiable, and the Constitution is not for sale.

In the coming years, as unconstitutional gun laws fall, gun dealers in restrictive states will have to adjust. They must return to their original role—providing firearms to law-abiding citizens—not profiting off government mandates. Those who truly value the Second Amendment will embrace this shift. Those who don’t will be exposed for what they are: profiteers of tyranny.

It’s time to hold gun dealers accountable. The Second Amendment is not just a talking point—it’s the supreme law of the land.

Taylor Swift from My Point of View

 

Taylor Swift is undeniably an impressive business phenomenon. She has built a remarkable empire that few in the music industry could hope to replicate.

There’s no denying she’s charming, with a pleasant but mediocre voice and an ever-evolving wardrobe that keeps her young, devoted audience captivated. When it comes to songwriting, she’s no Cole Porter, Burt Bacharach, or Carole King. Personally, none of her songs have left me humming along, which, I must admit, is something of a relief.

On the visual front, however, Swift deserves an A. Her concerts are a spectacle of showmanship and creativity, showcasing her as a powerful example of the American dream in action. I applaud her for that. Still, I can’t quite grasp how her overall package has inspired such an immense global following.

One misstep, in my view, was her political endorsement of Kamala Harris, which risked alienating part of her audience. Yet, I have no doubt she will weather that storm. After all, her empire is vast, though even the brightest stars don’t shine forever. Longevity like that of the Rolling Stones is rare, and I suspect her immense persona may begin to wane in the years ahead.

So, pity me if you will—I just don’t get it.