Phoenix, AZ—The Circus has folded up its tents and vacated
the surroundings of the Maricopa County Superior Court Building complex that
hosted, “The Greatest Show on Earth.” If that sounds inappropriate that’s
because it was just that. That Jodi
Arias trial was something of a perverted Roman Holliday.
Jodi Arias was involved in a somewhat routine domestic
disaster that left her young boyfriend Travis Alexander dead. We now know that Arias killed him but the
exact circumstances are shrouded in lies and mystery. Lies from the mouths of frightened suspects
usually flow like water at Niagara Falls.
Was the killing justified? We can
only guess. Domestic homicide often
unleashes massive rage because of so many factors unique to our most intimate
relationships.
Women defending themselves from attack by men have little
choice but to use deadly weapons because there is usually a serious disparity
of force between men and women.
Alexander’s injuries don’t shock me, I’ve seen worse in proven justifiable
cases.
It really makes no difference in our criminal justice system
whether the accused is actually guilty or innocent. The jury simply weighs the material it was
given to arrive at a verdict. If the
jury get’s it wrong that’s just too bad. Their verdict and they way they arrive
at it cannot be second-guessed by an appeals court. Only judicial errors get review by the higher
courts.
If jury misconduct is discovered that’s a different
matter. That generally will lead to new
trials. Jury misconduct is very
difficult to investigate or prove.
Judges always go out of their way preventing defense attorneys from
making effective inquiries of jury members.
The jury in the Arias case voted unanimously for a 1st
Degree Murder conviction making Arias a serious contender for Death Row. When it came to sentencing at least four of
them did not have the stomach to kill Arias.
She faces a new panel and sentencing hearing. Questions remain about double jeopardy and
finding an unbiased new jury panel. The
only thing that’s certain is the massive cost to arrive an acceptable
punishment.
This should never been prosecuted as a death penalty
case. Alexander’s family members are
Mormon and that religion believes that blood must always be shed to avenge a
killing. Mormons have a lot of influence
especially in Republican Primary Elections in the greater Phoenix area. The
County Attorney, Bill Montgomery is under a great deal of political pressure to
make sure Arias is put to death. It appears that may not be possible now.
The best thing for justice and taxpayers may be an agreement
for something like 25 years to life behind bars. Realistically that’s a much higher price than
would be exacted in most other states.
Arias will be retirement age upon the earliest possible release
date. The woman could do a lot of good
or not during that massive amount of time. She’d at least have a chance to
redeem herself.
Have we become so blood thirsty that we want to see this
woman strapped down and killed? Frankly
that is beneath the dignity of any civilized nation.
Let’s save a bundle of tax dollars and settle for an
agreement that would end appeals by Arias. Let’s hope that she can someday
redeem herself. Nothing will bring back
Travis Alexander or fill the hole left in his family. Frankly the Alexander family won’t find peace
until they can forgive. Arias must earn
that forgiveness by becoming a good example to the other inmates of Arizona’s
prison system. The taxpayers need a
break too. Lets hire more cops or schoolteachers
with the money we will certainly waste on killing Arias.
1 comment:
Further to the Mormons believing that bloodshed must be shed for a killing they also believe in "Celestial Marriage" and that bloodshed must be shed for adultery. They also believe blood must be shed for defamation of the Church or for divulging information about the church, particularly about their sacred rituals such as Blood Atonement. The link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_atonement outlines this thoroughly.
I spoke about the Travis Alexander murder with a good friend of mine, a well respected former Dakota Chief who retired after serving on the parole board for several years. He told me that in all his years in hearing paroles, he has never heard of a woman capable of such violent stabbings. This is something that men are capable of. He told me that when woman murder by stabbing it is usually when they are drunk and it is one or two stabs at the most that penetrate the heart which is only an inch or so below the skin. He agreed with me it is outrageous to think that a woman could slit someones throat from ear to ear, particularly for someone with a non-violent past.
Post a Comment