DREW PETERSON Photo by Paul Huebl |
Prosecutor James Glasgow has engaged in every stunt he could
to save himself the embarrassment of watching his high-profile case evaporate
ending his career.
In just two days the prosecution has knowingly and
intentionally exposed the jury to evidence precluded by the judges evidentiary
rulings. Both events prompted vigorous
defense motions for a Mistrial.
If a Mistrial is granted it would give Glasgow more time to somehow
try and solve massive problems he has with his own witnesses that can’t keep
their stories straight. It would require
a new jury panel be assembled and delay the proceeding another 60-90 days at a
minimum. In any event Glasgow can count
on watching a slew of impeachment witnesses destroy the state’s strongest
witnesses.
The extraordinary delays have been a defense investigator’s
dream. Each and every witness has had
time to blab to every friend and stranger they’ve encountered over the years. It is the work of defense investigators to locate and interview the impeachment witnesses. The fun part is the names of the impeachment witnesses need not be disclosed to the prosecution by the defense.
It will be the friends, ex-friends and acquaintances that
will recall the, rest of the story told by Glasgow’s witnesses. I can’t wait to hear some of the braggadocio
and hateful quotes attributed to these folks repeated in court for impeachment
purposes.
Glasgow has enjoyed unparalleled negative pre-trial publicity to
taint the case his way. Every single
piece of inadmissible evidence has and will continue to be published, broadcast
and posted on the Internet. No un-sequestered jury can
be immune from the tidal wave of information that is well beyond sensational
fiction.
It will be impossible for natural curiosity to not overwhelm jurors into finding out what’s happing each time the judge kicks them out of
the courtroom. They will find out not
only the information but, the outrageous embellishments added by the
anti-Peterson media forces.
This weekend the Jury will be searching the Internet like
prospectors looking for gold in absolute violations of the judge’s
admonishments.
In any event the judge has the power to grant the Mistrial and even bar any further prosecution of Peterson on this murder charge. Considering the continued conduct of the prosecution that would be a proper remedy.
Latest Update: The Judge has not ruled on today's defense Motion for Mistrial with Prejudice. The parties are ordered to return in the morning to resume arguments and present legal authorities. The fireworks are sure to continue!
My take:
I don’t think prosecutors fear the judge having the raw courage to grant a Mistrial with Prejudice. They really need to start over. They need to find out whom their witnesses were blabbing to and what they were saying. The also need to try and rehabilitate their witnesses so they don’t give yet another inconsistent version of their stories. The prosecution in day two has landed in a quagmire of their own making. I doubt seriously if they will make any kind of a graceful recovery.
In any event the judge has the power to grant the Mistrial and even bar any further prosecution of Peterson on this murder charge. Considering the continued conduct of the prosecution that would be a proper remedy.
Latest Update: The Judge has not ruled on today's defense Motion for Mistrial with Prejudice. The parties are ordered to return in the morning to resume arguments and present legal authorities. The fireworks are sure to continue!
My take:
I don’t think prosecutors fear the judge having the raw courage to grant a Mistrial with Prejudice. They really need to start over. They need to find out whom their witnesses were blabbing to and what they were saying. The also need to try and rehabilitate their witnesses so they don’t give yet another inconsistent version of their stories. The prosecution in day two has landed in a quagmire of their own making. I doubt seriously if they will make any kind of a graceful recovery.
A mistrial is still likely because and the damage of what
prosecutors allowed during testimony.
Tonight the media will be all over this and there’s no way to shield the
jury.
1 comment:
Personally I think he's a scumbag but that doesn't excuse this blatant witchhunt and circus! The rule of law applies to everyone, especially those we don't care for. And thanks for referring to Peterson as a "retired" cop and not "ex" like the mainstream media does. They know he's retired but they can't resist the shot of lessening him by calling him "ex."
Post a Comment