Paris Hilton’s new dilemma

Pretty, privileged and indiscrete is the best way to describe this media driven creature. I guess Paris Hilton is absolute proof that there’s no such thing as bad publicity. Hardly a day goes by when you aren’t bombarded with pictures of Hilton and her sordid stories. There’s no escape from the Hilton persona.

Now we are hearing the latest, really sordid Hilton gaffe. It seems Hilton somehow forgot to pay rent for a storage facility that housed her collection of raunchy homemade videos and photos we’ve not seen along with a diary, sex toys, personal papers, computers, heirlooms, clothes, and furniture. All of this hot property fell into the hands of the highest bidder who responded to the auction of the contents of Hilton’s locker. Now those salacious goods are on another auction block. This time the asking price is a cool $20,000,000.00!

Hilton has something in common with the likes of Tonya Harding, Jamie Foxx, Colin Farrell, Amber Frey, Darva Conger and Michael Jackson. What is that you ask? Why he’s none other than that Phoenix sometimes-bad boy, David Has Schmidt. Schmidt has been crowned, the “Sultan of Sleaze” for his ability to broker cash deals involving the dark sides of celebrities. Schmidt is at the epicenter of this latest Hilton publicity-storm.

I know Schmidt, and have always wondered if he’d ever find real financial success with these schemes that always seem to boost the careers of the celebrity victims. I somehow believe this time he’ll get a really good payday.

As for Paris Hilton, this will just get her face on even more tabloids, and magazine covers. There will be no shortage of TV stories to make the already famous Hilton name even more famous. Everybody wins in this debacle. I have to ask myself, why didn’t I buy the contents of Hilton’s storage locker at the auction?